Beta This part of GOV.UK is being rebuilt – find out what this means

HMRC internal manual

VAT Government and Public Bodies

From
HM Revenue & Customs
Updated
, see all updates

Non-business activities: distortions of competition: significant distortion

Although an activity may be identified as being in competition with the private sector, it can be more difficult to determine whether non-business treatment will lead to a significant distortion of competition.

The off-street car parking case of Isle of Wight Council (see also VATGPB8616) has indicated that the burden of proof lies with HMRC and not the public body to show that significant distortion of competition exists in relation to an activity performed by a public body. The Tribunal referred several questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (C 288/07) to clarify how this question should be considered.

The CJEU ruled that competition between public bodies and private operators must be considered in terms of the activity that is taking place and that this must be evaluated in national terms rather than in relation to any local market.

This means, for example, that in the Isle of Wight case it is whether there may be significant distortion of competition in relation to the provision of off-street car parking in general that must be decided rather than by reference to the environs of a local area.

The CJEU also ruled that, in relation to Article 13 of the Principal VAT Directive, the phrase ‘would lead to significant distortions of competition’ the words ‘would lead to’ are

‘to be interpreted as encompassing not only actual competition, but also potential competition, provided that the possibility of a private operator entering the relevant market is real, and not purely hypothetical’.

In the same ruling, the word ‘significant’ was to be

‘understood as meaning that the actual or potential distortions of competition must be more than negligible.’