This part of GOV.UK is being rebuilt – find out what beta means

HMRC internal manual

Stamp Duty Land Tax Manual

Example 1, Simple assignments of rights

This is an example of how the rules apply to an assignment of rights.

  • A enters into a sale and purchase agreement with B for some land with a consideration of £1 million payable on completion.
  • B assigns its rights under the contract to C for a payment of £100,000.
  • C completes the acquisition and pays A £1 million.

The intended outcome is that B should have to make a land transaction return for a transaction with consideration of £1 million but can include a claim for full relief. C should have to make a land transaction return with consideration of £1.1 million.

The transactions fall within Schedule 2A in the following way:

  • The transactions fall within the definition of a pre-completion transaction in paragraphs 1(1) and (2).
  • The pre-completion transaction is an ‘assignment of rights’ that falls within paragraph 2(1).
  • Under paragraph 1(1), 1(2) and 2(3): the original contract is the contract between A and B, the original purchaser is B, the transferee is C and the transferor is B.
  • The transferee is not regarded as entering into a land transaction by reason of the pre-completion transaction (paragraph 3).

The position of the transferee, C, is covered mainly by paragraph 4.

  • C is the purchaser under a land transaction under section 44(3) (paragraph 4(4)). Paragraph 4(2) provides that this is not prevented by the words ‘between the same parties’ in section 44(10).
  • Since paragraph 4(3)(a) is satisfied, paragraph 4(5) applies. Paragraph 4(5), read with paragraph 4(9), determines how paragraph 1 of Schedule 4 should be read to determine the chargeable consideration for C’s acquisition. The result is that both the £1 million given to A and the £100,000 given to B are included - total £1.1 million.
  • Under paragraph 8(3) the vendor for C’s acquisition is A; the land transaction return should be completed accordingly.

The position of the transferor, B, is covered mainly by paragraph 5, with relief available under paragraph 15.

  • The transactions fall within paragraph 5(1). Under that sub-paragraph, B is deemed to be the purchaser under a notional land transaction with the same effective date as C’s land transaction.
  • The chargeable consideration for the notional land transaction is dealt with in paragraph 5(3): it is the total of amount A and amount B. Amount A is £1 million as that is the consideration given by C to A under the original contract (paragraph 5(5) ‘amount A’ (a)). Amount B is nil, so the chargeable consideration is £1 million.
  • The transactions fall within paragraph 15 so B can claim full relief from tax (subject to the conditions outlined in paragraphs 15 and 18) under sub-paragraph (4).