Development of policyholder taxation: chargeable events
FA68 introduced a distinction between qualifying and non-qualifying policies. Verybroadly, this recognised the development of a growing distinction between protectiontype, and investment type life assurance products.
This distinction is a difficult one to draw because there is a continuous spectrum betweenpure protection, or term, insurance at one extreme, and investment policies where the lifeprotection element is essentially a formality. It was held by the Court of Appeal in theinsurance case of Fuji Finance Inc v Aetna Life Insurance Co Ltd& Another that even a policy that offered no mortality benefit, but paid out ondeath only the value of the underlying investments, is life assurance if it is sold by alife insurance company.
By 1968 it was recognised that large amounts of investment were flowing into short-term,investment-orientated policies, often single premium based. This called into question boththe granting of relief and the practice of relying on the insurers policyholderslice of tax to satisfy the policyholders liability. By that is meant that insurerspay tax on the part of their profits attributable to the policyholders investmentreturn. In 1968, this tax was broadly equivalent to the standard rate of income tax,predecessor of the basic rate, charged on those profits. It meant that surtax payers, theequivalent of those liable at higher rate, enjoyed a significant advantage.
The solution to what were seen as anomalies was to restrict premium relief to qualifyingpolicies and to introduce what is sometimes now called an exit charge tosurtax, now higher rate tax, when certain events take place that result in the realisationof value from a policy. The definition of these chargeable events variesdepending on whether or not the policy is a qualifying one, and qualifying policies oftenescape charge altogether.
- minimum 10 year policy term
- broadly even spread of premiums, payable at least once a year
- originally for endowment policies, and from 1976 for term and whole of life policies, a minimum sum assured equal to 75% of the premiums payable for the duration of the contract.
To meet industry concerns, and to prevent avoidance, the rules were and are complex.
|Further reference and feedback||IPTM1013|