Patent Box: relevant IP profits: relevant IP income: notional royalties: examples
Example 1 – process patent for in house machinery
Company X manufactures widgets. It holds a patent over a new mechanical process that makes the widget but the patent does not cover the widget itself. The sale of the widgets does not fall within Head 1 (sales income s357CC) and so the income is not relevant IP income. The company will need to calculate the income received from each widget before and after the patented machinery is first used to manufacture the widgets. This income for the purposes of the notional royalty provision will be ‘IP-derived income’, to the extent that it is reflected in the company’s trading income and is not included in other relevant IP income or excluded income. If only part of the mechanical process has been improved by the addition of a patented part, the IP derived income should only reflect the additional income received as a result of the patented improvements. So the amount of IP derived income will depend on the facts and the way the qualifying IP rights are used in the process. The company must then calculate an appropriate percentage of the IP derived income using transfer pricing principles. This means that Company X must consider what they would (hypothetically) pay a third party to licence the patented machinery at arm’s length in order to exploit that patent in that accounting period. This percentage is the notional royalty and is deemed to be the relevant IP income for the process sub-stream.
Example 2 – royalty received for patent within service provider
A telecommunications company Y provides broadband and data storage services to customers. Company Y developed a patented device which increases broadband download speeds and this feature generates additional business for the company. The company receives royalty income from providing the broadband and data services out of which it calculates ’ IP derived income’ which is the amount it receives as a result of exploiting the patented device. It can use using any appropriate methodology to do this. Company Y is then required to use transfer pricing methodology to calculate an appropriate percentage of that IP derived income which is the arm’s length amount it would be willing to pay another person for a licence to provide the patented broadband service (if it had not patented the device itself). That percentage of IP derived income that company Y calculates is the notional royalty used as deemed relevant IP income for the sub-stream.
Example 3 – simpler method for a company within small claims treatment
If company Z has made a small claims election under S357BNA then although company Z needs to identify and calculate the ‘IP derived income’ which is the amount it receives as a result of exploiting the qualifying IP rights, it can use using any appropriate methodology to do this. Company Z does not need to then perform a calculation using the OECD transfer pricing principles and instead it calculates the notional royalty as 75% of the ‘IP-derived income’. Further details are at CIRD273100.
Please refer to CIRD220305 for guidance on non-medical use claims.