Short leases: disposal: lease subject to sub-lease not at rack rent
- a lease is subject to a sub-lease at the time that it is acquired, and
- the sub-lease is not at a rack rent (a full market rent),
the lease may not become a wasting asset until the sub-lease ends.
This is because the value of the lease, whilst the sub-lease continues, is depressed by the low rental payable under the sub- lease. Hence its value will not waste away in the manner envisaged by the table in TCGA92/SCH8/PARA1.
In such a case, a special rule applies if the value of the lease at the time when the sub-lease comes to an end, estimated at the time that the lease is acquired, will exceed the cost of the lease. That special rule is that the lease does not become a wasting asset for the purposes of TCGA92/SCH8/PARA1 until the sub-lease comes to an end. This means that
- if the lease is disposed of before the sub-lease comes to an end, no reduction in the allowable expenditure is made under TCGA92/SCH8/PARA1 (4), see CG71144 and CG71147;
- if the lease is disposed of after the sub-lease comes to an end, the period of ownership, see CG71160, for the purpose of TCGA92/SCH8/PARA1 (4), begins on the date that the sub-lease ends.
Where, under TCGA92/S35, the lease is deemed to have been disposed of and reacquired at 31 March 1982, see CG16700+, the above rules will apply if the relevant conditions are satisfied on that date, even if the lease was not subject to a sub-lease at the actual date of acquisition.
The following example illustrates how this rule applies in practice.
Mr M acquired a 45year lease of a property on 31 March 1980 in return for the payment of a premium of £30,000. On 31 March 1981 he granted a 10 year sub-lease of the property, at less than a rack rent, in return for a premium of £20,000.
On 31 March 2013 he disposed of the lease, which then had 12 years left to run, for £25,000.
The Valuation Office Agency valued the lease, subject to the sub-lease, at £22,000 at 31 March 1982 and, taking account of the factors known at 31 March 1982, at £30,000 at 31 March 1991 (the date on which the sub-lease ended).
Mr M had made an election under TCGA92/S35 (5) and therefore no ‘kink test’ comparison was required.
- Since the lease is deemed to have been disposed of and reacquired on 31 March 1982, Mr M’s period of ownership began on that date, see CG71160, for the purposes of TCGA92/SCH8/PARA1.
- The conditions set out in CG71170 are satisfied at 31 March 1982 since the sub-lease was worth more at the date on which the sub-lease ended than it was at 31 March 1982. Hence, the lease did not become a wasting asset until the sub-lease ended.
The gain arising on the disposal of the lease is calculated as follows.
- Allowable expenditure
|Value of lease at 31 March 1982:||£22,000|
Amount to be excluded, Para 1(4) Sch 8:
|P(1) - P(3)||x||£22,000|
(Note: P(1) is the factor for the remaining term of the lease when the sub- lease ends, 34 years)
|=||91.156 - 53.191 x £22,000||=||£9,162|
Expenditure allowable under S 38(1)(a):
|£22,000 - £9,162||=||£12,838|
- Computation of gain