Official Statistics

Planning Inspectorate statistical release 23 November 2023

Published 23 November 2023

Applies to England

1. Introduction

This statistical release provides summary information on appeals, which represent the highest volume ( in terms of number of cases) of the Planning Inspectorate’s work.

These statistics are produced each month and the focus is on timeliness of decision-making, an area of particular interest for stakeholders. Information on the decisions that have been made is also included; and on the number of Inspectors available to make those decisions.

These statistics have been published to ensure everyone has equal access to the information and to support the Planning Inspectorate’s commitment to release information where possible.

This statistical bulletin provides:

• Appeals decisions and events held from November 2022 to October 2023
• The time taken to reach decisions
• Number of open cases
• Number of Inspectors

2. The Planning Inspectorate

The Planning Inspectorate makes decisions and provides recommendations and advice on a range of land use and planning-related issues across England.

The Planning Inspectorate deals with planning appeals, national infrastructure planning applications, examinations of local plans and other planning-related and specialist casework in England. The Planning Inspectorate is an executive agency, sponsored by the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities.

3. Summary

3.1 Time to decide cases

The median decision time for cases decided in October was 30 weeks.

Median timeliness by procedure type is shown in the summary table below.

Procedure type	Last 12 months	October 2023
Written Representations	30 weeks	30 weeks
Hearings	44 weeks	28 weeks
Inquiries	50 weeks	39 weeks
All Cases	31 weeks	30 weeks

The median time for planning cases was 29 weeks in October 2023. The 12 month median was also 29 weeks.

Enforcement decisions made in October 2023 had a median decision time of 49 weeks, with the 12 month median being 55 weeks.

The median time for planning appeals decided by inquiry under the Rosewell Process over the 12 months to October 2023 was 31 weeks.

3.2 Decisions

The Planning Inspectorate made 18,418 appeal decisions in the last 12 months, an average of 1,535 per month. The number of decisions in October 2023 was 1,660.

There were 1,566 written representations decisions in October 2023 and 16,984 in the last 12 months.

There were 916 decisions made on hearings during the last 12 months, and during October 2023, 54 decisions were issued.

There were 518 decisions made on inquiries during the last 12 months, with 40 in October 2023.

3.3 Planning Inspectors

There were 428 Planning Inspectors employed by the Inspectorate at the end of October 2023.

4. Decisions, Events & Open Cases

The number of decisions issued in October 2023 was 1,660, with a monthly average of 1,535 over the past 12 months.

The number of events recorded for October 2023 was 1,854, the average over the past 12 months was 1,542.

The median valid to decision time was 30 weeks in October 2023, as seen in Figure 1 and Table 1 below. The median valid to decision time has fallen slightly (1.0 weeks lower than September).

There are no clear trends for the number of events and decisions per month. However, the Christmas and Easter breaks do impact on the number of events arranged for December and April.

Figure 1: Number of events held , decisions issued and median time between valid date & decision date; November 2022 to October 2023.

Source: Horizon

Table 1: Number of events held, decisions issued and median time between valid date & decision date; November 2022 to October 2023.

Note 1: This table includes revisions to previously published data. Please see Annex C for further information

Month	Nov 22	Dec 22	Jan 23	Feb 23	Mar 23	Apr 23	May 23	Jun 23	Jul 23	Aug 23	Sep 23	Oct 23	Total
Events Held	1,867	1,005	1,815	1,644	1,392	1,194	1,552	1,583	1,438	1,640	1,524	1,854	18,508
Decisions	1,581	1,541	1,472	1,618	1,679	1,305	1,443	1,493	1,519	1,486	1,621	1,660	18,418
Median	30.7	30.4	31.1	28.7	29.3	29.1	30.1	31.6	33.3	31.0	31.4	30.4	30.7

Source: Horizon

Figure 2 below shows the number of cases received, closed and open for each of the last 12 months.

Note – The number of cases closed is higher than the number of decisions, as it includes cases where an appeal is withdrawn, notice is withdrawn, or the appeal is turned away.

Figure 2: Number of cases received, closed and open; November 2022 to October 2023.

Source: Horizon

Note 1: there is a known anomaly that means that the number of open cases does not exactly follow the volumes of cases closed or received (for example the number of open cases can increase between months even though the number closed exceeded the number received). The main reasons for this have been identified and are detailed in the Background Quality Report.

Table 2: Number of cases received, closed and open; November 2022 to October 2023.

Note: This table includes revisions to previously published data. Please see Annex C for further information

Month	Nov 22	Dec 22	Jan 23	Feb 23	Mar 23	Apr 23	May 23	Jun 23	Jul 23	Aug 23	Sep 23	Oct 23	Total
Received	1,882	1,602	1,672	1,569	1,906	1,444	1,752	1,571	1,680	1,566	1,574	1,627	19,845
Closed	1,803	1,718	1,698	1,789	1,865	1,446	1,618	1,779	1,746	1,679	1,819	1,879	20,839
Open	14,858	14,746	14,734	14,490	14,495	14,486	14,607	14,400	14,344	14,279	14,029	13,870

Source: Horizon

4.1 Number of Decisions

The Planning Inspectorate has made 18,418 appeal decisions in the last 12 months. There were 1,660 cases decided in October 2023.

Table 3 below shows the monthly breakdown with fewer decisions for the month of April 2023 and the past month being among the highest.

Table 3: Appeal Decisions; November 2022 to October 2023.

Month	Nov 22	Dec 22	Jan 23	Feb 23	Mar 23	Apr 23	May 23	Jun 23	Jul 23	Aug 23	Sep 23	Oct 23	Total
Decisions	1,581	1,541	1,472	1,618	1,679	1,305	1,443	1,493	1,519	1,486	1,621	1,660	18,418

Source: Horizon

Figure 3 – Appeal Decisions; November 2022 to October 2023.

Source: Horizon

4.2 Decisions by procedure and case type

Planning Inspectors work on a broader range of work than the appeals featured in this release. For example, they also work on examining Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project applications, Local Plans , Compulsory Purchase Order applications and many other specialist licencing/ application types.

Table 4 below gives the numbers of appeal decisions made broken down by whether the case was dealt with by written representations, hearings, or inquiries.

The large majority of decisions over the past 12 months (16,984) were made on written representations. This is 92% of all appeal decisions made. Table 4 shows that written representation decisions have varied from around 1,220 to around 1,570 per month over the past 12 months. There were 1,566 decisions in October 2023.

There were 916 decisions made on hearings during the last 12 months, the monthly average being 76. During October 2023 54 decisions were issued. In October 2023 40 decisions were made for inquiries. Decisions for inquiries since October 2022 have ranged between 28 and 79.

Table 4: Appeal Decisions by Procedure and Casework Category; November 2022 to October 2023.

Month	Nov 22	Dec 22	Jan 23	Feb 23	Mar 23	Apr 23	May 23	Jun 23	Jul 23	Aug 23	Sep 23	Oct 23	Total
Written Representations	1,459	1,338	1,329	1,495	1,530	1,220	1,314	1,405	1,418	1,395	1,515	1,566	16,984
Hearings	90	156	64	77	81	57	89	59	66	63	60	54	916
Inquiries	32	47	79	46	68	28	40	29	35	28	46	40	518
Total	1,581	1,541	1,472	1,618	1,679	1,305	1,443	1,493	1,519	1,486	1,621	1,660	18,418
Month	Nov 22	Dec 22	Jan 23	Feb 23	Mar 23	Apr 23	May 23	Jun 23	Jul 23	Aug 23	Sep 23	Oct 23	Total
Planning	1,336	1,289	1,228	1,397	1,391	1,110	1,195	1,258	1,260	1,260	1,340	1,411	15,475
Enforcement	174	192	184	169	235	138	149	173	207	194	226	188	2,229
Specialist	71	60	60	52	53	57	99	62	52	32	55	61	714
Total	1,581	1,541	1,472	1,618	1,679	1,305	1,443	1,493	1,519	1,486	1,621	1,660	18,418

Source: Horizon

What are Planning cases? The Planning category includes s78 planning appeals, householder appeals, commercial appeals, listed building consent appeals, advertisement appeals, s106 planning obligation appeals and Called In Planning Applications.

What are Enforcement cases? Enforcement covers enforcement appeals (i.e., appeals against the issue of an enforcement notice served by a local planning authority for alleged breaches of planning control), enforcement listed building notice appeals and lawful development certificate appeals.

What are Specialist cases? Specialist casework includes Common Land, Rights of Way orders (including Schedule 14 cases), Purchase orders, Tree Preservation Orders (excluding receipts and open cases), High Hedges appeals, Hedgerow appeals, Wayleave, Compulsory Purchase Orders, Secretary of State, Transport, Environmental Permitting Appeals and Coastal Access. Additional casework types have been added to this category over time.

The large majority of cases over the past 12 months were planning (15,475). This is about 84% of all appeal decisions made. There were 2,229 enforcement decisions and 714 specialist decisions. These totals are also shown in Table 4 above and Figure 4 below.

Trends for planning decisions show similar patterns to written representations. The average number of enforcement decisions over the past 12 months was 186. Specialist casework figures continue to vary each month, from a high of 99 in May 2023 to a low of 32 in August 2023. The counts of specialist casework are marked as provisional while the Planning Inspectorate undertake a review of the completeness or this category of data.

Figure 4 – Appeal Decisions by Procedure and Casework Category; November 2022 to October 2023p.

Source: Horizon

5. Decision timeliness

It is important for people to know how long an appeal is going to take, so that they can make informed plans and decisions. This section covers the timeliness of decisions (i.e., how long it takes to make a decision) across appeal casework. In addition to an overall measure, timeliness is analysed by procedure type and casework category, as timeliness varies a great deal depending on these characteristics.

Table 5 below shows that the median time to make a decision, across all cases in the last 12 months, was 31 weeks; and 30 weeks for October 2023. Figure 5 shows the median has ranged from 29 to 33 weeks for each of the last 12 months.

How is timeliness measured?

The time to make a decision is measured from the time the Inspectorate have enough information for the case to proceed (it is deemed ‘valid’) to the time a decision letter is issued. This means that any delay in ‘validating’ the appeal is included in the time to make a decision.

The decisions made in a given month will include those that started many months before, and thus do not give an accurate indication of how long appeals submitted, or deemed ‘valid’ in that month, will take.

Table 5 also shows the mean decision time for the last 12 months is 36 weeks. Each month the median is less than the mean, due to the impact of very long cases. Also included in the table is the standard deviation of decision timeliness, which is a measure of variation.

What are mean, median, and standard deviation?

Measure	Definition
Mean	The total time taken divided by the number of cases. Also referred to as the ‘average’. A measure of how long each case would take, if the total time taken was spread evenly across all cases.
Median	This is the time taken by the ‘middle’ case if all cases were sorted from quickest to longest
Standard deviation	This is a measure of variability or spread. It is calculated by examining how much each value differs from the mean. A higher standard deviation means the individual decision times vary more widely around the mean. A lower standard deviation would demonstrate greater consistency in the Planning Inspectorate’s decision timeliness.

Table 5: Median, mean and Standard Deviation of Time to Decision; November 2022 to October 2023.

Month	Nov 22	Dec 22	Jan 23	Feb 23	Mar 23	Apr 23	May 23	Jun 23	Jul 23	Aug 23	Sep 23	Oct 23	Total
Valid to Decision (median weeks)	30.7	30.4	31.1	28.7	29.3	29.1	30.1	31.6	33.3	31.0	31.4	30.4	30.7
Valid to Decision (mean weeks)	36.5	35.6	36.7	34.2	39.4	35.4	37.6	35.7	37.9	35.8	36.7	34.6	36.4
Standard Deviation (weeks)	22.4	21.9	24.1	22.8	35.1	22.5	27.4	20.4	21.9	20.8	21.6	19.0	23.8

Source: Horizon

Figure 5: Median and mean Time to Decision; November 2022 to October 2023.

Source: Horizon

Procedure Type

Table 6 below shows decision timeliness broken down by the procedure type. Hearings and inquires have typically taken longer than written representations , however, for the past four months written representations and hearings have had similar median decision times. Because 19 of every 20 cases are by written representation, the timeliness measures for written representations are similar to the measure across all cases.

Where a small number of cases has been decided, the average timeliness (whether mean or median) is less meaningful as a measure than where there are many cases. Those noted in the table caption below should be treated with caution as there are fewer than 20 cases decided.

Median times are less affected by a small number of large values than mean times, so are the focus of this commentary. The median time for written representations over the 12 months to October 2023 is 30 weeks. The median time for hearings over the 12 months to October 2023 is 44 weeks. The median time to decide for inquiries over the 12 months to October 2023 was 50 weeks.

Table 6: Mean and Median Time to Decision, with Standard Deviation, by Procedure; November 2022 to October 2023.

Note 1: where the number of decisions issued is fewer than 20, the measures mean, median and standard deviation are less meaningful.

Key: WR= Written Representations; HRG= Hearings; INQ= Inquiries; All= All Cases

Measure	Procedure	Nov 22	Dec 22	Jan 23	Feb 23	Mar 23	Apr 23	May 23	Jun 23	Jul 23	Aug 23	Sep 23	Oct 23	Total
Valid to decision (median weeks)	Written Representations	30.1	29.0	29.7	27.7	28.1	28.6	29.9	31.6	33.1	31.0	31.3	30.4	30.1
Valid to decision (median weeks)	Hearings	51.1	54.4	60.0	45.0	45.1	37.6	56.6	33.7	31.6	29.6	33.1	28.1	44.1
Valid to decision (median weeks)	Inquiries	41.1	38.6	73.3	58.0	179.6	79.1	38.4	33.7	42.7	28.0	61.9	39.4	50.2
Valid to decision (median weeks)	All Cases	30.7	30.4	31.1	28.7	29.3	29.1	30.1	31.6	33.3	31.0	31.4	30.4	30.7
Valid to decision (mean weeks)	Written Representations	34.8	32.6	33.3	32.0	34.1	33.7	34.4	35.0	36.8	34.8	35.4	34.1	34.3
Valid to decision (mean weeks)	Hearings	56.7	58.7	62.0	53.6	57.9	50.7	70.6	44.3	51.7	49.0	48.6	42.7	55.2
Valid to decision (mean weeks)	Inquiries	58.4	42.4	72.8	76.0	137.8	79.6	71.2	56.2	55.9	54.6	63.6	39.6	71.8
Valid to decision (mean weeks)	All Cases	36.5	35.6	36.7	34.2	39.4	35.4	37.6	35.7	37.9	35.8	36.7	34.6	36.4
Standard Deviation (weeks)	Written Representations	19.7	17.9	18.1	17.8	20.6	20.0	20.4	19.0	20.0	18.1	19.5	18.2	19.2
Standard Deviation (weeks)	Hearings	34.5	35.7	31.3	38.3	42.4	30.2	53.2	29.1	37.0	40.1	37.5	33.9	38.7
Standard Deviation (weeks)	Inquiries	43.4	18.2	49.8	54.6	89.1	40.7	57.2	40.1	35.2	48.0	32.9	15.0	58.2
Standard Deviation (weeks)	All Cases	22.4	21.9	24.1	22.8	35.1	22.5	27.4	20.4	21.9	20.8	21.6	19.0	23.8
Decisions	Written Representations	1,459	1,338	1,329	1,495	1,530	1,220	1,314	1,405	1,418	1,395	1,515	1,566	16,984
Decisions	Hearings	90	156	64	77	81	57	89	59	66	63	60	54	916
Decisions	Inquiries	32	47	79	46	68	28	40	29	35	28	46	40	518
Decisions	Total	1,581	1,541	1,472	1,618	1,679	1,305	1,443	1,493	1,519	1,486	1,621	1,660	18,418

Source: Horizon

The standard deviation information indicates that for all three procedures, there is considerable variation, meaning times are widely spread about the mean. For written representations, the amount of variation has been quite stable over recent months, whereas hearings and enquiries have experienced considerable month to month changes in the spread of decision times.

Casework Category

The nature of the cases the Planning Inspectorate deal with varies widely and several factors play a part in determining how long it takes to make a decision. One such factor is the type of casework. Table 7 below shows the time taken to decide, in planning cases, in enforcement cases, and in specialist cases, as does Figure 6.

The median time to decision for planning cases (there are many more of these decisions than in the other categories) is lower than for enforcement cases; and less variable than the times for specialist cases. Table 7 and Figure 6 show the median time for planning cases has been 26 weeks and above for each of the last twelve months.

Table 7: Decisions, Mean, Median and Standard Deviation of Time to Decision – Planning, Enforcement, Specialist Cases; November 2022 to October 2023.

Note 1: This table includes revisions to previously published data. Please see Annex C for further information

Casework Category	Measure	Nov 22	Dec 22	Jan 23	Feb 23	Mar 23	Apr 23	May 23	Jun 23	Jul 23	Aug 23	Sep 23	Oct 23	Total
Planning Cases	Valid to Decision (median weeks)	29.1	28.9	28.3	26.1	26.0	26.6	28.7	29.9	31.6	29.0	29.9	29.3	28.7
	Valid to Decision (mean weeks)	33.0	31.4	31.6	30.7	31.4	32.1	33.4	32.5	34.9	32.7	33.4	31.9	32.4
	St. dev. of decision (weeks)	17.6	16.0	16.3	17.8	18.6	20.0	22.3	17.5	19.8	17.4	18.9	16.6	18.3
Enforcement Cases	Valid to Decision (median weeks)	52.1	62.5	63.4	54.1	67.6	57.9	58.4	53.1	53.3	49.9	50.4	48.6	55.0
	Valid to Decision (mean weeks)	59.6	62.0	67.9	60.1	86.1	60.5	68.8	56.1	53.5	54.4	55.2	52.0	61.6
	St. dev. of decision (weeks)	32.3	31.6	36.6	36.1	62.3	26.4	41.0	21.1	22.3	26.5	24.7	22.7	35.8
Specialist Cases	Valid to Decision (median weeks)	34.7	26.9	36.7	38.2	28.7	37.6	35.1	32.4	40.4	29.8	33.7	35.1	34.6
	Valid to Decision (mean weeks)	47.9	41.4	45.0	45.9	42.3	39.7	42.6	44.1	47.9	43.1	42.1	41.3	43.6
	St. dev. of decision (weeks)	34.3	31.1	33.9	28.6	37.9	19.2	26.4	33.7	35.2	37.1	28.5	25.5	31.0

Source: Horizon

Annex A gives information on median and mean time to decision, with standard deviation, for the three procedure types, split by planning, enforcement, and specialist casework categories.

Enforcement decisions made in the past 12 months had a median decision time of 55 weeks.

There are considerably fewer specialist cases which means results are more liable to be distorted by extreme values. Looking at the annual measures, the median time to decision for specialist decisions have been shorter than enforcement decisions, and quite similar to the median for planning decisions.

Figure 6 – Median Time to Decision by Casework Category: November 2022 to October 2023.

Source: Horizon

Note that the Inspectorate publishes each month, information on the mean and median times from valid to decision, for selected appeal types. The information published also breaks down the time for each stage of the process. See Annex B for further details.

Planning Inquiry Decisions

For planning appeals decided by the inquiry process, The Planning Inspectorate has been implementing recommendations from the Rosewell review.

The median time for inquiries under Rosewell process over the 12 months to October 2023 is 31 weeks and the median time to decision for October 2023 was 37 weeks.

Table 8: Decisions, Mean and Median Time to Decision, Planning Inquiry Cases under Rosewell Process; November 2022 to October 2023.

Note 1: where there are fewer than 20 decisions, the measures mean, median and standard deviation are less meaningful.

Measure	Nov 22	Dec 22	Jan 23	Feb 23	Mar 23	Apr 23	May 23	Jun 23	Jul 23	Aug 23	Sep 23	Oct 23	Total
Decisions	19	39	25	15	18	9	20	17	16	21	32	17	248
Median (weeks)	29.4	38.6	30.0	31.7	29.4	24.9	28.6	30.0	26.3	25.3	61.9	36.9	31.1
Mean (weeks)	38.0	37.4	33.5	40.2	33.5	34.9	30.5	34.3	30.6	33.5	47.1	34.6	36.4
St. Dev. (weeks)	20.8	7.0	11.7	29.2	13.4	20.2	8.9	25.8	12.0	16.8	16.2	9.0	16.8

Most inquiry decisions now being issued are under the revised ‘Rosewell’ process but some inquiries, for example those that are linked together with associated enforcement cases, do not follow the Rosewell process.

Table 9: Decisions, Planning Inquiry Cases under non-Rosewell Process; November 2022 to October 2023.

Month	Nov 22	Dec 22	Jan 23	Feb 23	Mar 23	Apr 23	May 23	Jun 23	Jul 23	Aug 23	Sep 23	Oct 23	Total
Decisions	1	1	3	5	3	3	0	0	2	0	1	0	19

Source: Horizon

Figure 7 below shows the mean and median time to decision for planning inquiry cases under the Rosewell process.

Figure 7: Mean and Median Time to Decision, Rosewell Inquiry Process; November 2022 to October 2023.

Source: Horizon

6. Open Cases

At the end of October 2023, the Planning Inspectorate had 13,870 cases open. More information on the number of open cases, and how it has changed over the past 12 months, is in Table 2 and Figure 2 above.

The open cases comprised of 12,482 cases being handled through written representations; 745 through hearings; and 603 through inquiries, as well as 40 not currently allocated a procedure type. This is not the number of ‘live’ hearings and inquiries since it includes cases where the event (hearing or inquiry) has yet to start, as well as those where the event has finished but the decision has yet to be issued.

We have identified an error in the data that is used to count the number of started cases that have had an event, and the number that have not. While we rectify this, we have combined these two stages of the process in Table 10 below. We expect to return reporting on cases that have and have not yet had an event in next month’s bulletin.

Table 10: Open cases by procedure and stage, as of end of October 2023

Stage	Written Representations	Hearings	Inquiries	Total
Cases received but yet to be deemed valid	2,705	22	3	2,732
Cases deemed valid but yet to ‘start’	2,400	113	113	2,661
Case started but decision not yet issued	7,377	610	487	8,477
Total	12,482	745	603	13,870

Source: Horizon

Note 1 - there are 40 cases that have no procedure type recorded (see Background Quality Report for more detail) These are included in the total but excluded from the breakdown by procedure.

Note 2 – there is a known anomaly that means that the number of open cases does not exactly follow the volumes of cases closed or received (for example the number of open cases can increase between months even though the number closed exceeded the number received). The main reasons for this have been identified and are detailed in the Background Quality Report. The inspectorate are investigating how to introduce new processes to improve the quality of this data which once complete may result in revisions to the number of open cases.

7. Inspectors

Table 11 below shows the number of inspectors in the Planning Inspectorate in each month from November 2022 to October 2023 . This includes headcount (i.e. the number of different individuals) and full-time equivalents (FTE) where those working part time are counted in proportion with their contracted hours. There were 428 Planning Inspectors employed by the Inspectorate in October 2023 – with a full-time equivalent of 384.

Table 11: Planning Inspectors – Headcount and FTE; November 2022 to October 2023. (at end of month)

Month	Nov 22	Dec 22	Jan 23	Feb 23	Mar 23	Apr 23	May 23	Jun 23	Jul 23	Aug 23	Sep 23	Oct 23
Headcount	390	390	406	409	421	419	420	426	437	435	431	428
FTE	348.3	348.3	363.2	365.3	377.4	375.5	376.8	381.9	392.4	391.4	387.3	384.4

Source: SAP HR

As above, Planning Inspectors work on a broader range of work than the appeals featured in this Release. Please note that data on Planning Inspectors is only applicable to salaried employees (it does not include fixed term contract Inspectors or Planning and Appeal Decision Suppliers, previously referred to as non-salaried Inspectors).

8. Annex A – Mean and median time to decision, with standard deviation, for planning, enforcement, and specialist casework

8.1 Planning

Note: where there are fewer than 20 decisions, the measures mean, median and standard deviation are less meaningful. This applies to April, June, July and October 2023 for inquiries decisions.

Planning	Measure	Nov 22	Dec 22	Jan 23	Feb 23	Mar 23	Apr 23	May 23	Jun 23	Jul 23	Aug 23	Sep 23	Oct 23	Total
Written Representations	Decisions	1,253	1,167	1,161	1,323	1,311	1,059	1,113	1,189	1,192	1,189	1,264	1,352	14,573
Written Representations	Median Average Weeks	29.0	28.0	28.1	26.0	25.9	26.6	28.4	29.9	31.9	29.1	29.7	29.3	28.6
Written Representations	Mean Average Weeks	32.3	30.3	30.9	29.8	30.5	31.4	31.9	32.0	34.3	32.2	32.7	31.7	31.7
Written Representations	Standard Deviation Weeks	16.4	14.3	15.3	15.9	17.0	18.7	18.2	16.5	18.1	15.7	17.7	15.8	16.7
Hearings	Decisions	63	82	39	54	59	39	62	52	50	50	43	42	635
Hearings	Median Average Weeks	39.0	34.3	44.7	25.4	40.3	27.0	40.2	31.5	25.6	26.3	25.1	25.0	30.4
Hearings	Mean Average Weeks	44.8	42.9	48.5	41.9	47.6	42.7	61.4	42.9	50.2	43.4	40.1	39.5	45.8
Hearings	Standard Deviation Weeks	30.1	29.6	27.5	31.5	32.8	30.6	52.9	29.5	40.3	39.3	34.1	35.0	35.8
Inquiries	Decisions	20	40	28	20	21	12	20	17	18	21	33	17	267
Inquiries	Median Average Weeks	29.4	38.6	30.0	32.5	31.1	28.8	28.6	30.0	28.6	25.3	61.9	36.9	32.0
Inquiries	Mean Average Weeks	41.2	39.0	37.3	55.5	42.0	56.6	30.5	34.3	36.3	33.5	50.2	34.6	40.8
Inquiries	Standard Deviation Weeks	24.6	12.5	18.8	41.4	30.9	43.9	8.9	25.8	19.9	16.8	23.7	9.0	25.0
All Cases	Decisions	1,336	1,289	1,228	1,397	1,391	1,110	1,195	1,258	1,260	1,260	1,340	1,411	15,475
All Cases	Median Average Weeks	29.1	28.9	28.3	26.1	26.0	26.6	28.7	29.9	31.6	29.0	29.9	29.3	28.7
All Cases	Mean Average Weeks	33.0	31.4	31.6	30.7	31.4	32.1	33.4	32.5	34.9	32.7	33.4	31.9	32.4
All Cases	Standard Deviation Weeks	17.6	16.0	16.3	17.8	18.6	20.0	22.3	17.5	19.8	17.4	18.9	16.6	18.3

8.2 Enforcement

Note: where there are fewer than 20 decisions, the measures mean, median and standard deviation are less meaningful. This applies to all months for hearing other than November and December 2022 and March and May 2023 and all months for inquiry decisions other than January, February and March 2023.

Enforcement	Measure	Nov 22	Dec 22	Jan 23	Feb 23	Mar 23	Apr 23	May 23	Jun 23	Jul 23	Aug 23	Sep 23	Oct 23	Total
Written Representations	Decisions	145	118	122	130	174	112	112	160	184	182	204	158	1,801
Written Representations	Median Average Weeks	49.3	53.8	53.5	48.2	58.1	53.6	56.7	52.9	52.4	48.2	48.2	50.1	51.7
Written Representations	Mean Average Weeks	54.1	54.1	56.7	51.6	60.8	54.1	56.6	54.2	52.1	51.9	51.0	52.9	54.0
Written Representations	Standard Deviation Weeks	28.5	27.8	23.6	22.6	24.8	21.9	24.5	17.5	21.3	22.4	19.7	22.8	23.2
Hearings	Decisions	20	71	15	17	20	12	23	6	11	9	13	11	228
Hearings	Median Average Weeks	93.0	68.1	74.7	73.6	67.4	69.9	78.9	50.5	34.0	58.3	75.3	61.0	68.1
Hearings	Mean Average Weeks	85.5	75.2	80.8	87.9	84.1	70.5	96.5	56.6	50.4	74.8	81.9	56.6	77.9
Hearings	Standard Deviation Weeks	19.6	33.1	22.3	40.8	51.4	17.8	48.9	25.1	24.8	40.6	34.7	27.0	36.9
Inquiries	Decisions	9	3	47	22	41	14	14	7	12	3	9	19	200
Inquiries	Median Average Weeks	58.6	45.1	82.0	72.6	224.3	114.2	149.3	101.3	80.1	146.1	94.6	46.3	82.4
Inquiries	Mean Average Weeks	89.2	63.4	92.9	89.0	194.1	103.3	120.8	98.2	78.6	146.1	110.2	41.8	111.3
Inquiries	Standard Deviation Weeks	57.6	28.7	51.4	61.9	62.9	23.2	63.3	39.2	19.8	0.0	20.2	16.1	67.9
All Cases	Decisions	174	192	184	169	235	138	149	173	207	194	226	188	2,229
All Cases	Median Average Weeks	52.1	62.5	63.4	54.1	67.6	57.9	58.4	53.1	53.3	49.9	50.4	48.6	55.0
All Cases	Mean Average Weeks	59.6	62.0	67.9	60.1	86.1	60.5	68.8	56.1	53.5	54.4	55.2	52.0	61.6
All Cases	Standard Deviation Weeks	32.3	31.6	36.6	36.1	62.3	26.4	41.0	21.1	22.3	26.5	24.7	22.7	35.8

8.3 Specialist

Note: where there are fewer than 20 decisions, the measures mean, median and standard deviation are less meaningful. This applies to all months’ hearings decisions; and all months inquiries decisions.

Specialist	Measure	Nov 22	Dec 22	Jan 23	Feb 23	Mar 23	Apr 23	May 23	Jun 23	Jul 23	Aug 23	Sep 23	Oct 23	Total
Written Representations	Decisions	61	53	46	42	45	49	89	56	42	24	47	56	610
Written Representations	Median Average Weeks	31.3	26.9	29.6	31.9	24.3	35.0	34.1	31.3	35.0	23.9	29.0	35.1	31.1
Written Representations	Mean Average Weeks	41.7	36.3	32.2	38.0	33.6	36.3	38.3	41.8	42.4	31.0	40.6	41.0	38.2
Written Representations	Standard Deviation Weeks	29.1	26.0	22.1	20.7	24.3	16.4	22.4	33.7	30.9	19.9	28.8	25.8	25.9
Hearings	Decisions	7	3	10	6	2	6	4	1	5	4	4	1	53
Hearings	Median Average Weeks	66.3	85.1	88.5	53.9	99.1	65.2	71.5	38.9	70.9	63.8	34.9	25.1	66.3
Hearings	Mean Average Weeks	82.0	101.4	86.6	61.3	99.1	63.4	64.4	38.9	70.0	61.9	32.3	25.1	70.6
Hearings	Standard Deviation Weeks	42.3	33.5	27.1	23.2	55.9	24.3	26.4	0.0	12.2	16.4	6.7	0.0	33.4
Inquiries	Decisions	3	4	4	4	6	2	6	5	5	4	4	4	51
Inquiries	Median Average Weeks	91.1	48.1	73.8	111.6	69.9	51.9	97.5	68.3	42.7	98.9	59.9	47.1	62.0
Inquiries	Mean Average Weeks	80.0	60.0	85.0	106.1	88.7	51.9	91.3	71.7	71.9	96.8	68.9	50.2	78.6
Inquiries	Standard Deviation Weeks	27.6	31.1	41.7	26.3	58.3	3.0	23.6	23.9	58.4	65.0	21.9	20.7	42.7
All Cases	Decisions	71	60	60	52	53	57	99	62	52	32	55	61	714
All Cases	Median Average Weeks	34.7	26.9	36.7	38.2	28.7	37.6	35.1	32.4	40.4	29.8	33.7	35.1	34.6
All Cases	Mean Average Weeks	47.9	41.4	45.0	45.9	42.3	39.7	42.6	44.1	47.9	43.1	42.1	41.3	43.6
All Cases	Standard Deviation Weeks	34.3	31.1	33.9	28.6	37.9	19.2	26.4	33.7	35.2	37.1	28.5	25.5	31.0

9. Annex B – Detailed Information on timeliness (October 2023)

The information below is published today on the number and length of decisions made in October 2023 :

Note 1: when there are fewer than 20 decisions the measures mean, median and standard deviation are less meaningful.

Casework Type	Procedure Type	Median (weeks)	Mean (weeks)	Decisions
s78 planning appeals	Written Representations	32.0	36.0	844
s78 planning appeals	Hearings	26.0	40.6	39
s78 planning appeals	Inquiries	36.9	34.6	17
Householder appeals	Written Representations	17.5	20.1	372
Enforcement appeals	Written Representations	52.9	54.0	119
Enforcement appeals	Hearings	61.0	59.9	10
Enforcement appeals	Inquiries	46.3	43.9	17

Cells shaded grey had fewer than 20 decisions

The smaller the number of decisions, the less helpful the mean and median are as measures for summarising performance. Particular care should be taken when there are fewer than twenty decisions. These are shaded grey in the table but have been provided for completeness and transparency.

The information published below shows the time taken for different stages of the appeals process:

Note 1: s78 refers to s78 planning appeals

Measure	s78 Written Representations [Note 1]	s78 Hearings	s78 Inquiries	Householder appeals
Weeks between valid date & start date
Median (average)	14.3	2.9	2.9	7.6
Mean (average)	12.0	6.7	2.8	8.1
Cases that started in October 2023	837	53	26	440
Weeks between start date & event date
Median (average)	12.0	15.8	16.9	7.0
Mean (average)	15.3	18.6	19.8	8.6
Cases where an event occurred during October 2023	851	46	27	415
Weeks between event date & decision date
Median (average)	4.1	3.9	8.6	2.9
Mean (average)	5.6	7.0	12.4	4.1
Cases that have been decided in October 2023	813	36	14	371

Note: Only cases with both dates recorded appear in this table, meaning that numbers for cases decided and events recorded may be lower than those presented elsewhere.

Explanation of date terminology

Valid date	When a case is deemed to have been validly received.  Note – this is not always the date the case was validated. If a case is validated after the date it was validly received, it is the date it was validly received that is the valid date.
Start date	When a timetable, on how the appeal will progress, is issued to both the appellant and local authority. This timetable tells the appellant when to submit the information the Inspectors need to determine the appeal. It also tells the local authority when to notify interested parties about the appeal.
Event date	When the site visit, hearing, or inquiry occurred.
Decision date	When the decision was issued by The Planning Inspectorate.

Find out more about the process here - https://www.gov.uk/appeal-planning-decision/after-you-appeal

10. Annex C – Revisions to the data tables

This Annex lists all revisions made to the data since the last statistical release.

Note: Classed as a revision are any values which have changed by more than five (when measuring number of decisions/ cases) or more than 0.5 weeks (for mean, median or standard deviation of weeks).

There have been revisions to all previously reported events counts this month ( Table 1 and Figure 1), due to a change in the method for counting events. This is described in the Background Quality Report.

Table	Revisions
Table 1	Events held: July, August and September 2023
Table 2	Received: July, August and September 2023
Table 2	Closed: September 2023
Table 2	Open Cases: July, August and September 2023
Table 6	Valid to decision median weeks: hearings March andJuly 2023
Table 6	Valid to decision mean weeks: hearings March 2023 inquiries September 2023
Table 7	Valid to decision Specialist cases mean weeks: January, July and August 2023
Table 7	Standard deviation of valid to decision Specialist cases: January and August 2023
Annex A	Median weeks: Planning hearings March 2023
Annex A	Mean weeks: Planning hearings March 2023
Annex A	Median weeks: Enforcement hearings March 2023
Annex A	Standard deviation: Enforcement hearings March and May 2023
Annex A	Mean weeks: Enforcement inquiries September 2023
Annex A	Standard deviation: Enforcement inquiries September 2023
Annex A	Median weeks: Specialist cases written representations: January 2023
Annex A	Mean weeks: Specialist cases written representations: January 2023
Annex A	Standard deviation: Specialist cases written representations: January and August 2023
Annex A	Median weeks: Specialist cases hearings: July 2023
Annex A	Mean weeks: Specialist cases hearings: July and August 2023
Annex A	Standard deviation: Specialist cases hearings: July and August 2023

11. Background notes

Data sources

Horizon / Picaso – The main casework management systems used for processing appeals casework (note that Picaso is no longer a live system).

SAP HR – The Human Resources system database used to store all information regarding members of staff.

Compliance with the Code of Practice for Statistics

These statistics have been published in accordance with the Code of Practice for Statistics, which cover trustworthiness, quality, and value. They have been pre-announced, and publication is overseen by the Head of Profession.

Technical Notes

A Background Quality Report is published alongside this Statistical Release. It provides more detail on the quality of statistics in this publication.

Data quality

Data on cases is taken from a live casework system, and details of cases can change for a number of reasons even after a decision has been made. We are seeking to get a better understanding of the nature and volume of these changes and will provide further information as it is available.

We carry out regular checks on the quality of our data and may undertake ad hoc data cleansing exercises.  Therefore, all the data for the last 12 rolling months is published in provisional form.

We have indicated in this publication any data where a number of cases has changed by more than five cases in a month; or where a measure (mean, median or standard deviation) has changed by more than 0.5 weeks.

Measuring weeks

Data are measured in days and then converted to weeks.

Note that not all decimal values are possible where converting days to weeks. 1 day is 1/7 of a week, or 0.14 weeks (to two decimal places). 2 days = 0.29; 3 days = 0.43; 4 days = 0.57; 5 days = 0.71; 6 days = 0.86.

When these are used to calculate averages, or displayed to one decimal place, the result will not equate to a full day which can be misleading: it may appear that we are measuring part days (e.g. 19.8 weeks) but we only measure in whole days.

Glossary

Appeals	The right to appeal a planning decision made by a local authority is a key feature of the planning system, as is appealing when an authority is taking too long.
Appeals decided	Number of appeals by the date the appeal was decided by The Planning Inspectorate.
Appeals received	Number of appeals by the date the appeal was received by The Planning Inspectorate.
Applications	Planning Inspectorate manage the application process for proposed Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIPs) within England and Wales in line with the 2008 Planning Act.
Closed	The total number of appeals decided, withdrawn, or turned away.
Decision	The outcome of the case e.g. appeal allowed or rejected. The date of the decision is taken as the date a decision letter is sent to the appellant.
Event	A site visit, hearing, or inquiry (may be virtual)
Event Type	The different options of how an Inspector visits a site for a written representations appeal.
Examinations	The process of examining local plans is dealt with by the Planning Inspectorate. Every Local Planning Authority is required to have a local plan.  This includes a vision for the future and plan to address housing needs in the area. When a Local Planning Authority has finished preparing and consulting on a local plan it must be submitted to the Secretary of State who appoints an Inspector to carry out an independent examination.
FTE	Full Time Equivalent – a count of employees where those working part time are counted in proportion with their contracted hours.
Headcount	Total number of staff employed regardless of how many hours they work (i.e. the number of different individuals).
Hearings	A hearing involves the submission of written evidence by the main parties and a hearing once all the written submissions have been received. This takes the form of a round-the-table discussion (in person or virtually) that will be led by the planning inspector. It allows for all parties to respond to any questions that the inspector might have, and to let everyone make their case known. Source: Planning Portal
Inquiries	An inquiry is usually used for complex cases where legal issues may need to be considered. The main parties will usually have legal representatives to present their case and to cross-examine any witnesses. Prior to the inquiry date, the Planning Inspectorate will expect to have received various documents from all parties that will be taking part in the appeal. These may include statements of case and proofs of evidence from expert witnesses. Third parties may also take part. The inquiry will be led by the inspector and will follow a formal procedure. At some point during or on conclusion of the inquiry the inspector and the main parties will undertake a site visit. Source: Planning Portal
Live appeals	Number of live appeals in that have an appeal valid date but no end date (either decision date or a closed date, e.g. for appeals that have been withdrawn).
Mean	The total time taken divided by the number of cases. Also referred to as the ‘average’. A measure of how long each case would take, if the total time taken was spread evenly across all cases.
Median	This is the time taken by the ‘middle’ case if all cases were sorted from quickest to longest
Open Cases	Number of cases that have been received but on which a decision has not yet been made/ issued. Will differ from Live Appeals as it includes those received but not yet verified.
Procedure Type	The method by which The Planning Inspectorate processes and decides appeals.
Standard deviation	This is a measure of variability or spread. It is calculated by examining how much each value differs from the mean. A higher standard deviation means the individual decision times vary more widely around the mean.
Written Representations (includes Rights of Way Schedule 14)	Most planning appeals are decided by the written representations’ procedure. With this procedure the Inspector considers written evidence from the appellant, the LPA and anyone else who has an interest in the appeal. The site is also likely to be visited.

12. Contact Us

The Planning Inspectorate welcome feedback on our statistical products. If you have any comments or questions about this publication or about our statistics in general, you can contact us as follows:

Media enquiries 0303 444 5004 email press.office@planninginspectorate.gov.uk

Public enquiries email statistics@planninginspectorate.gov.uk

Please note we are currently reviewing our statistics with a view to making them as clear and helpful as possible for users. We would be delighted if you could contact us via the address below with any views on this approach; particularly on what content would be most useful and why.

email statistics@planninginspectorate.gov.uk

If you require information which is not available within this or other available publications, you may wish to submit a Request for Information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to the Planning Inspectorate. For more information, see: https://www.gov.uk/make-a-freedom-of-information-request/the-freedom-of-information-act