Policy paper

VAT: amendments to the VAT Refund Scheme for Museums and Galleries

Published 14 January 2016

Who is likely to be affected

Those museums and galleries added to the list of bodies entitled to benefit from the VAT Refund Scheme.

General description of the measure

This statutory instrument adds further museums and galleries that allow free public admission to the VAT Refund Scheme.

It also makes minor administrative amendments to correct names and addresses of institutions already listed.

Policy objective

The government is committed to free public admission to the main museums and galleries, and the VAT Refund Scheme supports this policy.

Background to the measure

Under the normal rules, a person can only reclaim VAT on the goods and services they purchase which are used to make an onward taxable supply. A museum or gallery that does not charge for entry is not making taxable supplies and therefore is not able to recover the VAT it incurs.

The refund scheme is set out in Section 33A of the VAT Act 1994. It was introduced to ensure that what would otherwise be irrecoverable VAT does not deter a body from allowing free admission. It refunds VAT paid on purchases made to support free rights of admission to a museum or gallery. The list of qualifying bodies is set out in the Schedule to SI 2001/2879, and the Treasury has the power to add bodies to the list or remove them from it.

The bodies and relevant museums to be added meet the conditions to be included in the scheme, although in common with the national libraries, one is included only in relation to its permanent public collections.

This statutory instrument also makes minor amendments such as to update addresses.

Detailed proposal

Operative date

It is intended that this statutory instrument will come into effect from XX XXXX 2016 subject to negative resolution.

Current law

Section 33A of the VAT Act 1994 refunds VAT paid by museums and galleries on purchases made in connection with free rights of admission to the public. Under Section 33A (9), the Treasury may by order specify the bodies to which refunds are made, and the date from which claims can be made. There is a single list of bodies in the Schedule of SI 2001/2879 and consequently amendments are made to the Schedule.

Proposed revisions

The Schedule to SI 2001/2879 will be amended to reflect the additions and changes already referred to.

Summary of impacts

Exchequer impact (£m)

2015 to 2016 2016 to 2017 2017 to 2018 2018 to 2019 2019 to 2020 2020 to 2021
negligible negligible negligible negligible negligible negligible

Economic impact

This measure is not expected to have any significant economic impacts.

Impact on individuals, households and families

Adding further museums and galleries to the VAT Refund Scheme for museums will assist in enabling free public access to collections that have not previously been available to the public.

Equalities impacts

This measure should not have an impact on any of those groups sharing protected characteristics.

Impact on business including civil society organisations

This measure is expected to have a negligible impact on businesses and civil society organisations.

The measure provides a real benefit to those institutions newly admitted to the scheme. The administrative burden associated with a relatively small number of additional institutions applying for VAT refunds is expected to be negligible.

Operational impact (£m) (HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) or other)

The refunds will be dealt with by established HMRC procedures and so there will be no extra operational cost.

Other impacts

There are no other impacts expected.

Monitoring and evaluation

This policy will be kept under review through communication with taxpayer groups affected by the measure.

Further advice

If you have any questions about this change, please contact Mustafa Noor on Telephone: 03000 579656 or email: mustafa.noor@hmrc.gsi.gov.uk.

Declaration

David Gauke MP, Financial Secretary to the Treasury, has read this tax information and impact note and is satisfied that, given the available evidence, it represents a reasonable view of the likely costs, benefits and impacts of the measure.