Decision

Decision on Shanghai Hengyuan Siemens Electric Appliance Co., Ltd

Updated 1 April 2021

Order under the Companies Act 2006

In the matter of application No. 3106

For a change of company name of registration No. 12362930

Decision

The company name SHANGHAI HENGYUAN SIEMENS ELECTRIC APPLIANCE CO., LTD has been registered since 13 December 2019 under number 12362930.

By an application filed on 3 January 2020, SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT applied for a change of name of this registration under the provisions of section 69(1) of the Companies Act 2006 (the Act).

A copy of this application was sent to the primary respondent’s registered office on 23 January 2020, in accordance with rule 3(2) of the Company Names Adjudicator Rules 2008. The copy of the application was sent by Royal Mail “Signed For” service and also by standard mail. On 23 January 2020, the Tribunal wrote to Jialiang Chen to inform him that the applicant had requested that he be joined to the proceedings. No comments were received from Jialiang Chen in relation to this request. On 8 July 2020, Jialiang Chen was joined as a co-respondent. On 8 July 2020, the parties were advised that no defence had been received to the application and so the adjudicator may treat the application as not being opposed. The parties were granted a period of 14 days to request a hearing in relation to this matter, if they so wished. No request for a hearing was made.

The primary respondent did not file a defence within the two month period specified by the adjudicator under rule 3(3). Rule 3(4) states:

The primary respondent, before the end of that period, shall file a counter-statement on the appropriate form, otherwise the adjudicator may treat it as not opposing the application and may make an order under section 73(1).

Under the provisions of this rule, the adjudicator may exercise discretion so as to treat the respondent as opposing the application. In this case I can see no reason to exercise such discretion and, therefore, decline to do so.

As the primary respondent has not responded to the allegations made, it is treated as not opposing the application. Therefore, in accordance with section 73(1) of the Act I make the following order:

(a) SHANGHAI HENGYUAN SIEMENS ELECTRIC APPLIANCE CO., LTD shall change its name within one month of the date of this order to one that is not an offending name ^{[footnote 1]};

(b) SHANGHAI HENGYUAN SIEMENS ELECTRIC APPLIANCE CO., LTD and Jialiang Chen each shall:

(i) take such steps as are within their power to make, or facilitate the making, of that change;

(ii) not to cause or permit any steps to be taken calculated to result in another company being registered with a name that is an offending name.

In accordance with s.73(3) of the Act, this order may be enforced in the same way as an order of the High Court or, in Scotland, the Court of Session.

In any event, if no such change is made within one month of the date of this order, I will determine a new company name as per section 73(4) of the Act and will give notice of that change under section 73(5) of the Act.

All respondents, including individual co-respondents, have a legal duty under Section 73(1)(b)(ii) of the Companies Act 2006 not to cause or permit any steps to be taken calculated to result in another company being registered with an offending name; this includes the current company. Non-compliance may result in an action being brought for contempt of court and may result in a custodial sentence.

The applicant is requesting its costs. It states:

The respondent company is registered at Unit G25 Waterfront Studios, 1 Dock Road, London, United Kingdom, E16 1AH which is also the registered office address for UK registered companies nos 12202156, 11361379 LIMITED and 11363896 LTD, all of which have been the subject of prior Tribunal applications by the Applicant.

The respondent company lists two officers, one being an individual, Jialiang Chen, and the other being a company, YUNMA TIANLONG INTERNATIONAL CONSULTING CO., LIMITED.

YUNMA TIANLONG INTERNATIONAL CONSULTING CO., LIMITED is also an officer of GUANGDONG CENTURY SIEMENS KITCHEN & BATH ELECTRIC CO., LTD (company no. 12202156). It is also a former officer of 11361379 LIMITED (formerly SIEMENS ELECTRICAL APPLIANCE LIMITED), 11363896 LTD (formerly SIEMENS ELECTRIC CO., LTD) and 10152002 LIMITED (formerly Jincheng Siemens Electronic Technology Co., Limited). All four of these companies are or have been the subject of Tribunal Applications by the Applicant and are clearly related to one another.

In three of the prior sets of proceedings we wrote to the respective applicants to seek a change of name prior to filing the Tribunal application but did not receive any response. All of the ensuing applications were undefended and we did not receive any communications from the Respondent parties at any time.

In conclusion, the indications are that the company name at issue has been selected and registered in bad faith and there is no reason to believe that a request for voluntary change of name will be complied with.

In the light of these circumstances and the applicant having been successful, it is entitled to a contribution towards its costs. I order SHANGHAI HENGYUAN SIEMENS ELECTRIC APPLIANCE CO., LTD and Jialiang Chen, being jointly and severally liable, to pay SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT costs on the following basis:

Fee for application: £400
Statement of case: £400

Total: £800

This sum is to be paid within seven days of the expiry of the appeal period or within seven days of the final determination of this case if any appeal against this decision is unsuccessful.

Any notice of appeal against this decision to order a change of name must be given within one month of the date of this order. Appeal is to the High Court in England, Wales and Northern Ireland and to the Court of Session in Scotland.

The company adjudicator must be advised if an appeal is lodged, so that implementation of the order is suspended.

Dated 12th November 2020

Susan Eaves
Company Names Adjudicator

1. An “offending name” means a name that, by reason of its similarity to the name associated with the applicant in which he claims goodwill, would be likely to be the subject of a direction under section 67 (power of Secretary of State to direct change of name), or to give rise to a further application under section 69. ↩