Three billion a year could be saved from costs of infrastructure says report
This was published under the 2010 to 2015 Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government
A Government report by Infrastructure UK sets out a blueprint to save up to three billion a year on building and maintaining infrastructure.
A Government report by Infrastructure UK (IUK) today sets out a blueprint to save up to three billion a year on building and maintaining infrastructure.
Treasury Ministers welcomed the plan saying it could promote growth by freeing up more money for infrastructure investment, as well as helping keep water, gas and electricity bill costs down for consumers by reducing costs for utility companies.
The report outlines how costs of building and maintaining energy, transport, waste and flood defence infrastructure projects can be reduced by at least 15%. With between £15 and £20 billion being spent each year, this equates to savings of between two and three billion a year - between £20 billion and £30 billion over the next decade.
The savings in delivery cost would be achieved by Government working with industry to improve procurement, raise productivity, simplify processes and promote innovation and better industry integration.
Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Danny Alexander said:
One look at projects like the Olympics, where over £600million has been saved, shows that the UK can deliver big infrastructure projects on time and within budget.
We just have to make sure that the rest learn from the best. By working with industry we can identify ways to save money for them and the taxpayer. The data gathered through IUK’s investigation has enabled us to identify savings of between £400 million and £800 million from the initial cost estimate for High Speed 2.
Savings are in everyone’s interests, as it will see the taxpayer get more value for money and will make the UK a cheaper place to do business, promoting growth in the long term.
Lord Sassoon, Commercial Secretary to the Treasury, said:
I am most grateful to Terry Hill and colleagues for their work in preparing this report. It is very significant that the construction industry has been an integral part of what is fundamentally a cost-cutting review. That is because they can see this work as helping to create a step change in the way infrastructure is delivered in the UK. This should lead to a stronger UK construction chain - and a UK construction industry that is even better placed to complete globally.
The report was welcomed by key industry players, including Richard Lambert, the CBI Director-General. He said:
Investment in infrastructure will be essential for economic recovery in the UK. This important report clearly sets out how waste can be reduced in the delivery of construction projects, allowing subsequent savings to therefore be reinvested.
The report concludes that:
- there is a lack of certainty over long-term workflow;
- the UK over-specifies and applies unnecessary standards;
- strategic investment is constrained because industry is fragmented;
- blurring of decision-making roles make governance inefficient;
- competitions are burdensome and stifle innovation;
- a lack of data limits capability to set challenging targets.
The evidence of the Steering Group of industry leaders found the following scope to reduce costs in the delivery of UK infrastructure by:
- eliminating peaks and troughs in the infrastructure investment pipeline;
- improving client leadership, streamlining project governance and procurement;
- reducing unnecessary prescription, standards and third party requirements;
- improving asset management and benchmark data;
- developing smarter ways to use competition; and
- encouraging industry to invest more in innovation and skills.
Terry Hill, chair of the Investigation Steering Group, a member of IUK’s Advisory Council and leader of Arup’s Global Transport market said:
I am delighted to have received such strong support during this investigation, not only from Government Ministers and IUK, but also from colleagues in the infrastructure industry and from the Institution of Civil Engineers. Achieving the potential benefits of £2-3 billion per annum requires a sustained and multi-faceted approach from Government and industry.
Evidence from the investigation suggests a high degree of consensus that efficiency improvements can be achieved and that the infrastructure construction industry will respond positively to client side improvements in planning, commissioning and procurement of projects and programmes. Clients will respond in turn to improvements in industry by becoming more efficient and transparent.
The Government is working to finalise a prioritised programme for implementation to be announced by Budget 2011.
Notes for Editors
A copy of the report and its key recommendations can be found at: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/iuk_cost_review_index.htm
The June 2010 Budget announced that Infrastructure UK would carry out an investigation into how to reduce the cost of delivery of civil engineering works for major infrastructure projects to report by the end of 2010. The investigation has been led by Infrastructure UK in collaboration with wider government, the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) and industry.
This autumn the Government published the UK’s first National Infrastructure Plan which showed that we need a step change in the amount the UK invests in its infrastructure. This outlined that £200 billion of investment in UK infrastructure was needed over the next 5 years.
Infrastructure UK is a division of HM Treasury. It is focussed on enabling greater private sector investment in infrastructure, and the improvement of the Government’s long-term planning, prioritisation and delivery of infrastructure. Further details are in the National Infrastructure Plan and on the Treasury’s website.
- examination of high speed lines across Europe indicated that the construction costs in the UK were significantly higher. Those projects most directly comparable showed that CTRL1 construction costs were at least 23% higher;
- major station development costs indicate that the UK is 50% more expensive than Spain, although UK stations serve a significantly higher peak passenger demand - up to 2.7 times in certain cases;
- benchmarking of eight road projects between the UK and Netherlands indicated that UK examples were, on average, 10% higher based on the unit costs per lane kilometre. The Highways Agency has identified project efficiencies of 20% were it able to adopt a programme approach to delivery across schemes.
Captains of industry endorsements
Richard Lambert, CBI Director-General:
Investment in infrastructure will be essential for economic recovery in the UK. This important report clearly sets out how waste can be reduced in the delivery of construction projects, allowing subsequent savings to therefore be reinvested. The CBI Construction Council welcomes this and wants to play a leadership role in developing a more integrated supply chain. Construction needs to rise to the productivity challenge, while increasing efficiency and innovation. At the same time, the Government must ensure the visibility and continuity of the infrastructure project pipeline, and foster competition and reward success when it procures. This is an important opportunity for change that could boost our productivity and improve the nation’s finances at the same time.
Paul Skinner, Chair of Infrastructure UK:
There are real opportunities and benefits for industry in bringing greater clarity and accountability into the roles of clients, contractors and funders of major infrastructure projects. This requires greater discipline in the way projects are structured and also the development of smarter ways of driving competition and encouraging innovation. The programme will provide a double benefit: not only will it enable taxpayers to get more for less and minimise the impact of investment on utility bills, but also the resulting efficiencies will support the growth agenda by encouraging industry to invest in innovation and new ways of working.
Ian Tyler, CEO of Balfour Beatty and a member of the Steering Group:
I welcome this report and am encouraged by the commitment that has been demonstrated by contributors in both public and private sectors to arrive at these conclusions. Many of these challenges are well known, but have not been tackled. There is now a real opportunity for Government and industry leaders to work together and find ways to reduce costs and stimulate economic growth for our industry and the UK.
Peter Hansford, President of the Institution of Civil Engineers and member of the study Steering Group:
I am please that ICE and industry was able to come together with Government to contribute to this report. By bringing together leaders in the infrastructure world - across transport, energy, waste and water - we were able to develop a cross sector approach to identifying and addressing the factors that can drive down the cost of major infrastructure projects. I very much welcome the outcome and look forward to continuing our dialogue with Government to help implement the actions.
Paul Morrell, Chief Construction Adviser, BIS:
Infrastructure is a critical element of our plans for growth in the UK economy. This report complements the findings of the report recently published on the Low Carbon Construction by the BIS Innovation and Growth Team and demonstrates the potential for a joined up approach to the ways in which we deliver construction in the UK.
Investigation steering group members
- Terry Hill (Chairperson): Chairperson, Global Transport Market, Arup
- Humphrey Cadoux-Hudson: Managing Director Nuclear New Build, EDF
- Lucy Chadwick: Director of Rail and Road Projects, DfT
- Stephen Dance: Head of Public Sector Markets, Infrastructure UK
- Peter Hansford: President, Institution of Civil Engineers
- Phil Holland: Executive Vice President Projects, Shell
- Chris Newcome: Director, Anglian Water
- Paul Morrell: Chief Construction Adviser, BIS
- David Pitchford: Head of Major Projects, ERG
- Ian Tyler: Chief Executive Officer, Balfour Beatty
Infrastructure UK would be pleased to receive views on issues raised and proposals made in the document via e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Media enquiries should be addressed to the Treasury Press Office on 020 7270 5238.