Accounting standards regulations: US and Japan parent companies - review of costs and benefits
This was published under the 2010 to 2015 Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government
This consultation has concluded
Download the full outcome
The Accounting Standards (Prescribed Bodies) (United States of America and Japan) Regulations 2012: post implementation review
Ref: BIS/15/443 PDF, 276KB, 32 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email firstname.lastname@example.org. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.
Detail of outcome
You can view the final legislation The Accounting Standards (Prescribed Bodies) (United States of America and Japan) Regulations 2015. The regulations allow parent companies listed on stock exchanges in USA or Japan, wishing to move to the UK, a longer period to comply with UK reporting requirements for their group accounts. The enhanced regulations will give eligible companies a permanent rolling transition period of up to 4 years to adopt UK accounting standards.
This consultation ran from
Considers the costs of financial reporting for parent companies listed on the securities and stock exchanges in the US and Japan under the UK system.
This consultation was held on another website.
We’re reviewing the Accounting Standards (Prescribed Bodies) (United States of America and Japan) Regulations 2012. The regulations allow companies listed on the stock and securities exchanges in US or Japan, but not in the EU, to continue to use their GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) for group accounts until December 2014. Our aim for this temporary provision was to give these companies a reasonable period to make the transition in their accounting practices.
We’re asking for your views so we can understand how the changes have affected companies and the UK’s wider accountancy system. The review will inform our policy in this area and, in particular, whether the regulations should be remade in some form.