Perinatal interventions and survival in resource-poor settings: which work, which don't, which have the jury out?

Abstract

Perinatal conditions make the largest contribution to the burden of disease in low-income countries. Although postneonatal mortality rates have declined, stillbirth and early neonatal mortality rates remain high in many countries in Africa and Asia, and there is a concentration of mortality around the time of birth. Our article begins by considering differences in the interpretation of ‘intervention’ to improve perinatal survival. We identify three types of intervention: a single action, a collection of actions delivered in a package and a broader social or system approach. We use this classification to summarise the findings of recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses. After describing the growing evidence base for the effectiveness of community-based perinatal care, we discuss current concerns about integration: of women's and children's health programmes, of community-based and institutional care, and of formal and informal sector human resources. We end with some thoughts on the complexity of choices confronting women and their families in low-income countries, particularly in view of the growth in non-government and private sector healthcare.

Citation

Archives of Disease in Childhood (2010) 95 (12) 1039-1046 [doi:10.1136/adc.2009.179366].

Perinatal interventions and survival in resource-poor settings: which work, which don’t, which have the jury out?

Help us improve GOV.UK

Don’t include personal or financial information like your National Insurance number or credit card details.