Widening participation in higher education can be a force for democratisation. It can also map on to elite practices and contribute to further differentiation of social groups. Those with social capital are often able to decode and access new educational opportunities. Those without it can remain untouched by initiatives to facilitate their entry into the privileges that higher education can offer. This paper is based on our ESRC/DFID funded research project on Widening Participation in Higher Education in Ghana and Tanzania: Developing an Equity Scorecard. Meritocratic discourse infers that individual achievement is the most important principle determining access and success in higher education. However, meritocracy implies selection and exclusion. The project is statistically and discursively deconstructing merit. We are mapping meritocracy in order to identify if the most marginalised communities are being included in the widening participation agenda. In this paper, we demonstrate how current opportunity structures reflect traditional beliefs about meritocracy and reproduce privilege and exclusion. We argue that when gender is intersected with socio-economic status, participation rates of poorer women are seen to be extremely low in both African countries.
Paper presented at the SRHE Annual Conference 2008 ‘Valuing Higher Education’ held in Liverpool, 9 - 11 December 2008, 11 pp.
Mapping Meritocracy: Intersecting Gender, Poverty and Higher Educational Opportunity Structures. SRHE Paper.