Integrating agroecology with Payment for Ecosystem Services in Santa Catarina's Atlantic Forest
There are no longer acceptable trade-offs between agriculture and ecosystem services
Abstract
There are no longer acceptable trade-offs between agriculture and ecosystem services: Both are essential and at risk. Agroecology may be uniquely capable of providing both. However, there are real costs to promoting agroecology that someone must pay, but any payment scheme must recognize that many of the services provided as well as the resources required to provide them are both public goods. Payments to individual farmers do little to provide these services, especially if they are contingent upon provision. Public sector investments are required. Since the public goods provided by these investments cross political boundaries, payments for these investments should flow from those governments or collective institutions that benefit to those that will provide the services, supplementing resources invested by the latter.
Citation
Schmitt A., Farley J., Alvez J., Alarcon G., Rebollar P.M. (2013) Integrating Agroecology with Payments for Ecosystem Services in Santa Catarina’s Atlantic Forest. In: Muradian R., Rival L. (eds) Governing the Provision of Ecosystem Services. Studies in Ecological Economics, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht
Links
Integrating agroecology with Payment for Ecosystem Services in Santa Catarina’s Atlantic Forest