Evaluating the Targeting Effectiveness of Social Transfers: A Literature Review

Abstract

Many methodologies exist for dividing a population into those who are classified as eligible for social transfers and those who are ineligible. Popular targeting mechanisms include means testing, proxy means tests, categorical, geographic, community-based, and self-selection.

This paper reviews empirical evidence from a range of social protection programmes on the accuracy of these mechanisms, in terms of minimising four targeting errors: inclusion and exclusion, by eligibility and by poverty. This paper also reviews available evidence on the various costs associated with targeting, not only administrative but also private, social, psycho-social, incentive-based and political costs. Comparisons are difficult, but all mechanisms generate targeting errors and costs. Given the inevitability of trade-offs, there is no ‘best’ mechanism for targeting social transfers. The key determinant of relative accuracy and cost-effectiveness in each case is how well the targeting mechanism is designed and implemented.

Citation

Devereux, S.; Masset, E.; Sabates-Wheeler, R.; Samson, M.; Rivas, A. M.; Te Lintelo, D. Evaluating the Targeting Effectiveness of Social Transfers: A Literature Review. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, UK (2015) 67 pp.

Evaluating the Targeting Effectiveness of Social Transfers: A Literature Review

Help us improve GOV.UK

Don’t include personal or financial information like your National Insurance number or credit card details.