Cost-utility analysis of LED fluorescence microscopy in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in Indian settings
Light emitting diode technology-based- FM is a cost-effective intervention for detecting TB cases at high-workload medical colleges
Abstract
Background
With support from the Stop TB Partnership’s TB REACH Wave 2 Grant, diagnostic microscopy services for tuberculosis (TB) were upgraded from conventional Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) based sputum microscopy to light emitting diode technology-based fluorescence microscopy (LED FM) in 200 high-workload microscopy centres in India as a pilot intervention.
Objective
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of LED-FM over conventional ZN microscopy to inform further scale-up.
Methods
A decision-tree model was constructed to assess the cost utility of LED FM over ZN microscopy. The results were summarised using incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER); one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were also conducted to address uncertainty within the model. Data were analysed from 200 medical colleges in 2011 and 2012, before and after the introduction of LED microscopes. A full costing analysis was carried out from the perspective of a national TB programme.
Results
The ICER was calculated at US$14.64 per disability-adjusted life-year, with an 82% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold equivalent to Indian gross domestic product per capita.
Conclusions
LED FM is a cost-effective intervention for detecting TB cases in India at high-workload medical college settings.
This research was supported by the UK Department for International Development’s Operational Research Capacity Building Programme led by the International Union Against TB and Lung Disease (The Union)
Citation
V. Kelly, K. D. Sagili, S. Satyanarayana, L. W. Reza, S. S. Chadha, N. C. Wilson (2015) Cost-utility analysis of LED fluorescence microscopy in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in Indian settings. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 19(6):696–701 Q 2015 The Union http://dx.doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.14.0203