FOI release

FOI data 180319014

Updated 14 June 2019
Download CSV 2.65 KB

Download the file to see all the information

This preview shows the first 1,000 rows and 50 columns. Download CSV 2.65 KB

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL CLAIMS RECEIVED AND STRUCK OUT IN ENGLAND AND WALES
FOR DISCRIMINATION JURISDICTIONS
FROM 1 JANUARY 2017 TO 31 DECEMBER 2017 p
Jurisdiction1
Age discrimination
Disability discrimination
Race discrimination
Religious Belief discrimination
Sex discrimination
Sexual Orientation discrimination
Total Claims
1 A claim may contain more than one jurisdictional complaint. These are the number of accepted single and multiple claims where the main jurisdiction is either Age, Disability, Race, Religious belief, Sex or Sexual orientation discrimination.
2 This is the total number of single and multiple claims received in the period where the main grounds for complaint is one of the discrimination jurisdictions. Single claims are made by a sole employee/worker, relating to alleged breaches of employment rights.
Multiple claims are where two or more people bring proceedings arising out of the same facts, usually against a common employer. Multiple claims tend to be more volatile as they can contain a high number of claims against a single employer.
3 Formerly Disposed of/Otherwise. Number of single and multiple claims struck out (not at a hearing) in the reporting period. Note: claims disposed will not necessarily have been received in the same reporting period.
4 An Employment Tribunal claim can be made of one or more jurisdictional complaint. As a deposit order can be made for all or part of the claim, the above table shows the number of jurisdictional complaints from both single and multiple claims where a deposit order is requested for one or more of the associated  jurisdictions, namely Race discrimination, Sex discrimination, Disability discrimination, Age discrimination, Religion/belief discrimination or Sexual orientation discrimination.
p Provisional - subject to further change.
Although care is taken when processing and analysing the data, the details are subject to inaccuracies inherent in any large-scale recording system, and is the best data that is available at the time of publication.