Corporate report
10. Training: data table (CSV)
Updated 4 April 2016
Download CSV 6.03 KB
| 10. Training Data |
|---|
| Data source: |
| Civil Service Learning. |
| Time period and availability: |
| Latest data covers period 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015. |
| What does this tell us? |
| These data show percentages of our employees who are at different stages of completing e-learning applied for with Civil Service Learning in the period, against their status in relation to each of the following protected characteristics: age; disability; ethnicity; and gender. |
| How will an improvement be shown? |
| Broadly an increase in the percentage would constitute an improvement as it would indicate an increase in the amount of training applied for and completed. However, this needs to be considered alongside relative headcount, relevant declaration rates and volumes, so is not precise. In addition, it should also be borne in mind that training needs are unique to each individual within the organisation. |
| Table 10.1: Percentage of training at different stages by age 1,2 |
| Age |
| 16-24 |
| 25-29 |
| 30-34 |
| 35-39 |
| 40-44 |
| 45-49 |
| 50-54 |
| 55-59 |
| 60-64 |
| 65+ |
| Prefer not to say / unknown |
| Total |
| Source: Civil Service Learning |
| Notes: |
| 1. Data period 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given. |
| 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. |
| 3. Percentages shown are the number of applicants at that stage who indicated that protected characteristic, over the total number of applicants at that stage. |
| 4. Percentages shown are the number of applicants by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| Table 10.2: Percentage of training at different stages by indicated disability 1,2 |
| Stage |
| Disability |
| Disabled |
| Non-disabled |
| Prefer not to say/ unknown |
| Total |
| Source: Civil Service Learning |
| Notes: |
| 1. Data period 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given. |
| 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. |
| 3. Percentages shown are the number of applicants at that stage who indicated that protected characteristic, over the total number of applicants at that stage. |
| 4. Percentages shown are the number of applicants by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| Table 10.3: Percentage of training at different stages by indicated ethnicity 1,2 |
| Stage |
| Ethnicity |
| Ethnic minority |
| White |
| Prefer not to say / unknown |
| Total |
| Source: Civil Service Learning |
| Notes: |
| 1. Data period 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given. |
| 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. |
| 3. Percentages shown are the number of applicants at that stage who indicated that protected characteristic, over the total number of applicants at that stage. |
| 4. Percentages shown are the number of applicants by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| Table 10.4: Percentage of training at different stages by gender 1,2 |
| Stage |
| Gender |
| Female |
| Male |
| Prefer not to say / unknown |
| Total |
| Source: Civil Service Learning |
| Notes: |
| 1. Data period 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given. |
| 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. |
| 3. Percentages shown are the number of applicants at that stage who indicated that protected characteristic, over the total number of applicants at that stage. |
| 4. Percentages shown are the number of applicants by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |