Corporate report
5. Grievance: data table (CSV)
Updated 4 April 2016
Download CSV 7.93 KB
| 5. Grievances |
|---|
| Data source |
| Resource Management. |
| Time period and availability |
| Latest data covers the period from 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015. |
| What does this tell us? |
| The data presented here shows the percentage of employees who have raised a grievance against their status in relation to each of the following protected characteristics: age; disability; ethnicity; and gender. As the total numbers of grievances are quite small, the percentages can vary considerably without implying significant differences. Compared with the 2013 report, the percentages of grievances have increased for all groups. A gender difference has also developed with men being more likely to raise a grievance. The increases for those declared as disabled or ethnic minority has roughly maintained the proportions in the 2013 report. |
| How will an improvement be shown? |
| Generally the similarity of this indicator between groups will indicate equivalent behaviour. However, this will require a reasonably complete declaration rate and sufficiently large volumes to be precise. In addition, it should also be borne in mind that raising a grievance is a decision of the individual that takes into account a range of personal factors. |
| Table 5.1: Percentage of employees by age who raised a grievance1,2 |
| Age |
| 16-24 |
| 25-29 |
| 30-34 |
| 35-39 |
| 40-44 |
| 45-49 |
| 50-54 |
| 55-59 |
| 60-64 |
| 65+ |
| Total |
| Source: Resource Management |
| Notes: |
| 1. Data period 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given. |
| 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. |
| 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees raising a grievance by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees raising a grievance who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees raising a grievance by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 5. Percentages shown are the number of employees by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 6. Data from previous years not available for this group. |
| Table 5.2: Percentage of employees by indicated disability who raised a grievance 1,2 |
| Disability |
| Disabled |
| Non-disabled |
| Total |
| Source: Resource Management |
| Notes: |
| 1. Data period 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given. |
| 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. |
| 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees raising a grievance by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees raising a grievance who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees raising a grievance by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 5. Percentages shown are the number of employees by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 6. Data from previous years not available for this group. |
| Table 5.3: Percentage of employees by indicated ethnicity who raised a grievance 1,2 |
| Ethnicity |
| Ethnic minority |
| White |
| Total |
| Source: Resource Management |
| Notes: |
| 1. Data period 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given. |
| 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. |
| 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees raising a grievance by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees raising a grievance who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees raising a grievance by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 5. Percentages shown are the number of employees by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 6. Data from previous years not available for this group. |
| Table 5.4: Percentage of employees by gender who raised a grievance1,2 |
| Gender |
| Female |
| Male |
| Total |
| Source: Resource Management |
| Notes: |
| 1. Data period 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given. |
| 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. |
| 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees raising a grievance by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees raising a grievance who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees raising a grievance by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 5. Percentages shown are the number of employees by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 6. Data from previous years not available for this group. |