See more information about this guidance

Corporate report

6. Performance markings: data table (CSV)

Updated 4 April 2016
Download CSV 14.2 KB

Download the file to see all the information

This preview shows the first 1,000 rows and 50 columns. Download CSV 14.2 KB

6. Performance markings
Data source:
Resource Management.
Time period and availability:
Latest data as at 23 June 2015
What does this tell us?
How will an improvement be shown?
Generally the similarity of this indicator between groups will indicate equivalent behaviour. However, this will require a reasonably complete declaration rate and sufficiently large volumes to be precise. As data is only shown for those who made a declaration, any conclusions made are less definite. It should also be considered that females represent over two thirds of DWP's current employee headcount and that, if making comparisons to previously published results, relative sizes of the different groups will vary from year to year (including those who required no performance mark).
Table 6.1: Percentage of performance mark awarded by age in relation to overall number of performance markings given 1, 2, 3, 5
Age
16-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65+
Total
Source: Resource Management
Notes: 1.Latest data as at 23 June 2015. 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees awarded a performance marking who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 5. This data does not include the SCS or employees who have not been awarded a marking.
Table 6.2: Percentage of performance mark awarded by age in relation to total number of employees in that group 1, 2, 4, 5
Age
16-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65+
All Age Groups
Source: Resource Management
Notes: 1. Latest data as at 23 June 2015. 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees awarded a performance marking who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 5. This data does not include the SCS or employees who have not been awarded a marking.
Table 6.3: Percentage of performance mark awarded by indicated disability in relation to overall number of performance markings given 1, 2, 3, 5
Disability
Disabled
Non-Disabled
Total Declared
Source: Resource Management
Notes: 1. Latest data as at 23 June 2015. 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees awarded a performance marking who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 5. This data does not include the SCS or employees who have not been awarded a marking.
Table 6.4: Percentage of performance mark awarded by indicated disability in relation to total number of employees in that group 1, 2, 4, 5
Disability
Disabled
Non-Disabled
Total Declared
Source: Resource Management
Notes: 1. Latest data as at 23 June 2015. 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees awarded a performance marking who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 5. This data does not include the SCS or employees who have not been awarded a marking.
Table 6.5: Percentage of performance mark awarded by indicated ethnicity in relation to overall number of performance markings given 1, 2, 3, 5
Ethnicity
Ethnic minority
White
Total Declared
Source: Resource Management
Notes: 1. Latest data as at 23 June 2015. 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees awarded a performance marking who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 5. This data does not include the SCS or employees who have not been awarded a marking.
Table 6.6: Percentage of performance mark awarded by indicated ethnicity in relation to total number of employees in that group 1, 2, 4, 5
Ethnicity
Ethnic minority
White
Total Declared
Source: Resource Management
Notes: 1.Latest data as at 23 June 2015. 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees awarded a performance marking who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 5. This data does not include the SCS or employees who have not been awarded a marking.
Table 6.7: Percentage of performance mark awarded by gender in relation to overall number of performance markings given 1, 2, 3, 5
Gender
Female
Male
Total Declared
Source: Resource Management
Notes: 1. Latest data as at 23 June 2015 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees awarded a performance marking who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 5. This data does not include the SCS or employees who have not been awarded a marking.
Table 6.8: Percentage of performance mark awarded by gender in relation to total number of employees in that group 1, 2, 4, 5
Gender
Female
Male
Total Declared
Source: Resource Management
Notes: 1. Latest data as at 23 June 2015 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees awarded a performance marking who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 5. This data does not include the SCS or employees who have not been awarded a marking.