Corporate report
7. Promotion: data table
Updated 30 September 2014
Download CSV 7.98 KB
| 7. Promotion |
|---|
| Data source: |
| Resource Management. |
| Time period and availability: |
| Latest data covers the period from 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014. |
| What does this tell us? |
| The data presented here show employees promoted against their status in relation to each of the following protected characteristics: age; disability; ethnicity; and gender. The results indicate a gradually declining promotion percentage with increasing age group of 25 and above. There are lower percentages for promotion for those declared as disabled or ethnic minority or female. These numbers are too small to represent a significant difference and may be affected by the declaration rate. Compared with the 2013 report, there has been a considerable decline in the promotion percentage. The percentages for those declared as disabled, ethnic minority or female are lower than those outside these groups. However the numbers are too small to be significant and some have to be interpreted in the light of the applicable declaration rate. |
| How will an improvement be shown? |
| Generally the similarity of this indicator between groups will indicate equivalent behaviour. However, this will require a reasonably complete declaration rate and sufficiently large volumes to be precise. |
| Table 7.1: Percentage of employees promoted by age1,2 |
| Age |
| 16-24 |
| 25-29 |
| 30-34 |
| 35-39 |
| 40-44 |
| 45-49 |
| 50-54 |
| 55-59 |
| 60-64 |
| 65+ |
| Total |
| Data Source: Resource Management |
| Notes: |
| 1. Data period 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given. |
| 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. |
| 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees working part time by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees working part time who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees working part time by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 5. Percentages shown are the number of employees by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 6. Data for previous years is not available. |
| Table 7.2: Percentage of employees promoted by indicated disability 1,2 |
| Disability |
| Disabled |
| Non-disabled |
| Total |
| Data Source: Resource Management |
| Notes: |
| 1. Data period 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given. |
| 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. |
| 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees working part time by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees working part time who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees working part time by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 5. Percentages shown are the number of employees by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 6. Data for previous years is not available |
| Table 7.3: Percentage of employees promoted by indicated ethnicity 1,2 |
| Ethnicity |
| Ethnic minority |
| White |
| Total |
| Data Source: Resource Management |
| Notes: |
| 1. Data period 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given. |
| 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. |
| 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees working part time by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees working part time who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees working part time by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 5. Percentages shown are the number of employees by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 6. Data for previous years is not available. |
| Table 7.4: Percentage of employees promoted by gender1,2 |
| Gender |
| Female |
| Male |
| Total |
| Data Source: Resource Management |
| Notes: |
| 1. Data period 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given. |
| 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. |
| 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees working part time by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees working part time who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees working part time by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 5. Percentages shown are the number of employees by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |
| 6. Data for previous years is not available |