See more information about this guidance

Corporate report

10. Training data: data table

Updated 30 September 2014
Download CSV 6.99 KB

Download the file to see all the information

This preview shows the first 1,000 rows and 50 columns. Download CSV 6.99 KB

10. Training Data
Data source:
Civil Service Learning.
Time period and availability:
Latest data covers period 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014.
What does this tell us?
This data shows percentages of our employees who are at different stages of completing e-learning applied for with Civil Service Learning in the period, against their status in relation to each of the following protected characteristics: age; disability; ethnicity; and gender. The applicable rate of those preferring not to say or unknown is also shown. The percentage of received applications, by age group, appears to show a closer match to headcount than was the case in the 2013 report. The percentage of received applications from the 55 and above age groups is improved from the previous report, but does remain below the applicable headcount. However it should be noted that the percentage preferring not to say or unknown has also risen. The category of those preferring not to say or unknown continues to be greater than the percentage declared disabled. Hence although the percentage of those declared disabled is somewhat below the applicable headcount, the result is not conclusive. The percentage of received applications from those declared ethnic minority has declined by the same value as the rise in those preferring not to say or unknown. Hence it is not possible to indicate if any change in behaviour has actually taken place. Compared to the 2013 report, the percentage of received applications from females has increased, but remains below the applicable overall headcount. However the percentages of applications by gender do lie within the corresponding ranges for Bands A/AA to E/SEO. Table 1.7 indicates that these bands are the grades for the majority of employees.
How will an improvement be shown?
Generally the similarity of this indicator between groups will indicate equivalent behaviour. However, this will require a reasonably complete declaration rate and sufficiently large volumes to be precise. It should also be borne in mind that training needs are specific to each member of staff within the organisation.
Table 10.1: Percentage of training at different stages by age 1,2
Age
16-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65+
Prefer not to say / unknown
Total
Source: Civil Service Learning
Notes:
1. Data period 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given.
2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding.
3. Percentages shown are the number of applicants at that stage who indicated that protected characteristic, over the total number of applicants at that stage.
4. Percentages shown are the number of employees promoted by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic.
Table 10.2: Percentage of training at different stages by indicated disability 1,2
Disability
Disabled
Non-disabled
Prefer not to say/ unknown
Total
Source: Civil Service Learning
Notes:
1. Data period 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given.
2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding.
3. Percentages shown are the number of applicants at that stage who indicated that protected characteristic, over the total number of applicants at that stage.
4. Percentages shown are the number of employees promoted by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic.
Table 10.3: Percentage of training at different stages by indicated ethnicity 1,2
Stage
Ethnicity
Ethnic minority
White
Prefer not to say / unknown
Total
Source: Civil Service Learning
Notes:
1. Data period 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given.
2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding.
3. Percentages shown are the number of applicants at that stage who indicated that protected characteristic, over the total number of applicants at that stage.
4. Percentages shown are the number of employees promoted by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic.
Table 10.4: Percentage of training at different stages by gender 1,2
Stage
Gender
Female
Male
Prefer not to say / unknown
Total
Source: Civil Service Learning
Notes:
1. Data period 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given.
2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding.
3. Percentages shown are the number of applicants at that stage who indicated that protected characteristic, over the total number of applicants at that stage.
4. Percentages shown are the number of employees promoted by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic.