See more information about this guidance

Corporate report

6. Performance markings: data table

Updated 30 September 2014
Download CSV 13.5 KB

Download the file to see all the information

This preview shows the first 1,000 rows and 50 columns. Download CSV 13.5 KB

6. Performance markings
Data source:
Resource Management.
Time period and availability:
Latest data as at 31 March 2014.
What does this tell us?
The data presented here shows the proportion of employees awarded each performance marking against their status in relation to each of the following protected characteristics: age; disability; ethnicity; and gender. In the current performance management marking system employees are categorised as 'Exceeded', 'Achieved' and 'Must Improve'. Employees who were not awarded a marking for the 2013 / 14 performance year have been omitted from this data.
How will an improvement be shown?
Generally the similarity of this indicator between groups will indicate equivalent behaviour. However, this will require a reasonably complete declaration rate and sufficiently large volumes to be precise. It should also be considered that females represent over two thirds of DWP's current employee headcount.
Table 6.1: Percentage of performance mark awarded by age in relation to overall number of performance markings given 1, 2, 3, 5
Age
16-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65+
Total
Source: Resource Management
Notes: 1.Latest data as at 31 March 2014. 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees awarded a performance marking who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 5. This data does not include the SCS or employees who have not been awarded a marking.
Table 6.2: Percentage of performance mark awarded by age in relation to total number of employees in that group 1, 2, 4, 5
Age
16-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65+
All Age Groups
Source: Resource Management
Notes: 1. Latest data as at 31 March 2014. 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees awarded a performance marking who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 5. This data does not include the SCS or employees who have not been awarded a marking.
Table 6.3: Percentage of performance mark awarded by indicated disability in relation to overall number of performance markings given 1, 2, 3, 5
Disability
Disabled
Non-Disabled
Total Declared
Source: Resource Management
Notes: 1. Latest data as at 31 March 2014. 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees awarded a performance marking who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 5. This data does not include the SCS or employees who have not been awarded a marking.
Table 6.4: Percentage of performance mark awarded by indicated disability in relation to total number of employees in that group 1, 2, 4, 5
Disability
Disabled
Non-Disabled
Total Declared
Source: Resource Management
Notes: 1. Latest data as at 31 March 2014. 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees awarded a performance marking who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 5. This data does not include the SCS or employees who have not been awarded a marking.
Table 6.5: Percentage of performance mark awarded by indicated ethnicity in relation to overall number of performance markings given 1, 2, 3, 5
Ethnicity
Ethnic minority
White
Total Declared
Source: Resource Management
Notes: 1. Latest data as at 31 March 2014. 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees awarded a performance marking who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 5. This data does not include the SCS or employees who have not been awarded a marking.
Table 6.6: Percentage of performance mark awarded by indicated ethnicity in relation to total number of employees in that group 1, 2, 4, 5
Ethnicity
Ethnic minority
White
Total Declared
Source: Resource Management
Notes: 1.Latest data as at 31 March 2014. 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees awarded a performance marking who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 5. This data does not include the SCS or employees who have not been awarded a marking.
Table 6.7: Percentage of performance mark awarded by gender in relation to overall number of performance markings given 1, 2, 3, 5
Gender
Female
Male
Total Declared
Source: Resource Management
Notes: 1. Latest data as at 31 March 2014. 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees awarded a performance marking who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 5. This data does not include the SCS or employees who have not been awarded a marking.
Table 6.8: Percentage of performance mark awarded by gender in relation to total number of employees in that group 1, 2, 4, 5
Gender
Female
Male
Total Declared
Source: Resource Management
Notes: 1. Latest data as at 31 March 2014. 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees awarded a performance marking who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees awarded a performance marking by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. 5. This data does not include the SCS or employees who have not been awarded a marking.