See more information about this guidance

Corporate report

2. Disciplinary procedures: data table

Updated 30 September 2014
Download CSV 8.39 KB

Download the file to see all the information

This preview shows the first 1,000 rows and 50 columns. Download CSV 8.39 KB

2. Disciplinary procedures
Data source:
Resource Management.
Time period and availability:
Latest data covers the period from 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014.
What does this tell us?
The data presented here shows the percentage of employees who have been subject to formal disciplinary procedures against their status in relation to each of the following protected characteristics: age; disability; ethnicity; and gender. For ease of comparison the tables include a column illustrating the appropriate headcount breakdown by age, taken from a table earlier in this report. These results show a declining trend in the percentage disciplined by age group up to 54. It can be noted that the volumes in the 16-24 and over 65 age groups are too small to draw any conclusions. The large volumes of staff not declared in respect of ethnic minority and disabled protected groups are such that it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding percentage differences in those protected characteristics. Compared with the 2013 report, the total number of staff disciplined in age groups above 45 has increased. However the increase is small. The numbers of those disciplined who identify as disabled is almost identical to the previous year. The numbers disciplined who identify as ethnic minority show a considerable reduction compared with the previous year, but this is too small to be significant. The gender group breakdown of those disciplined is not significantly different from the 2013 report.
How will an improvement be shown?
Generally the similarity of this indicator in a protected and non-protected group will indicate equivalent behaviour. However, this will require a reasonably complete declaration rate and sufficiently large volumes to be precise.
Table 2.1: Percentage of employees by age who were disciplined1,2
Age
16-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65+
Total
Source: Resource Management
Notes:
1. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding.
2. Data period 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given.
3. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees disciplined who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic.
4. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic.
5. Percentages shown are the number of employees by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic.
6. Data from previous years not available for this group.
Table 2.2: Percentage of employees by indicated disability who were disciplined 1,2
Disability
Disabled
Non-disabled
Total
Source: Resource Management
Notes:
1. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding.
2. Data period 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given.
3. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees disciplined who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic.
4. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic.
5. Percentages shown are the number of employees by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic.
6. Data from previous years not available for this group.
Table 2.3: Percentage of employees by indicated ethnicity who were disciplined 1,2
Ethnicity
Ethnic minority
White
Total
Source: Resource Management
Notes:
1. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding.
2. Data period 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given.
3. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees disciplined who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic.
4. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic.
5. Percentages shown are the number of employees by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic.
6. Data from previous years not available for this group.
Table 2.4: Percentage of employees by gender who were disciplined1,2
Gender
Female
Male
Total
Source: Resource Management
Notes:
1. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding.
2. Data period 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given.
3. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees disciplined who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic.
4. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic.
5. Percentages shown are the number of employees by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic.
6. Data from previous years not available for this group.