Corporate report

2. Disciplinary procedures: data table (CSV)

Updated 4 April 2016
Download CSV 7.46 KB

2. Disciplinary procedures
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Data source: Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Resource Management. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Time period and availability: Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Latest data covers the period from 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
What does this tell us? Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
The data presented here shows the percentage of employees who have been subject to formal disciplinary procedures against their status in relation to each of the following protected characteristics: age; disability; ethnicity; and gender. For ease of comparison the tables include a column illustrating the appropriate headcount breakdown by age, taken from a table earlier in this report. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
How will an improvement be shown? Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Generally the similarity of this indicator in a protected and non-protected group will indicate equivalent amounts of disciplinary action. However, this will require a reasonably complete declaration rate and sufficiently large volumes to be definitive. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Table 2.1: Percentage of employees by age who were disciplined1,2 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Age % disciplined by age group3,6 Not set Not set % of age group disciplined4 Not set Not set Not set Not set % of total headcount by age group5,6 Not set Not set
Not set 2013 2014 2015 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2013 2014 2015
16-24 3.4 1.1 0.6 5.1 5.8 3.8 2.2 0.5 1.7 1 1.3
25-29 8.6 5.7 4.3 3.5 3.8 3.1 2.8 1.4 5.4 4.3 3.5
30-34 10.1 8.8 8.3 2.8 2.8 2.3 2.3 1.3 8.6 8.1 7.4
35-39 10.1 9.9 10.7 2.4 2.1 2 2.1 1.3 9.9 9.6 9.7
40-44 13.2 13.6 12.8 1.8 2 1.8 2.1 1.2 14.2 13.8 13.2
45-49 17.2 18.4 18.6 1.7 1.8 1.7 2 1.2 19.5 19.5 19.1
50-54 16.1 18.1 17.9 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.9 1 19 20 20.8
55-59 13.3 14.3 15.3 2.1 1.9 1.9 2 1.1 13.8 15.1 16
60-64 6.2 8 8.8 2 2.5 1.9 2.4 1.4 6.3 6.8 7.2
65+ 1.9 2.1 2.6 1.7 2.6 2.4 2.5 1.8 1.5 1.7 1.7
Total 100 100 100 2.2 2.2 2 2.1 1.2 100 100 100
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Source: Resource Management Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Notes: Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
1. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
2. Data period 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
3. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees disciplined who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
4. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
5. Percentages shown are the number of employees by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
6. Data from previous years not available for this group. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Table 2.2: Percentage of employees by indicated disability who were disciplined 1,2 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Disability % disciplined by indicated disability group3,6 Not set Not set % of indicated disability group disciplined4 Not set Not set Not set Not set % of total headcount by indicated disability group5,6 Not set Not set
Not set 2013 2014 2015 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2013 2014 2015
Disabled 9.7 9.8 7.9 2.5 2.8 2.7 2.9 1.3 6.5 6.8 6.9
Non-disabled 90.3 90.2 92.1 1.9 2 1.8 1.9 1.2 93.5 93.2 93.1
Total 100 100 100 - - - - - 100 100 100
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Source: Resource Management Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Notes: Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
1. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
2. Data period 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
3. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees disciplined who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
4. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
5. Percentages shown are the number of employees by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
6. Data from previous years not available for this group. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Table 2.3: Percentage of employees by indicated ethnicity who were disciplined 1,2 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Ethnicity % disciplined by indicated ethnic group3,6 Not set Not set % of indicated ethnic group disciplined4 Not set Not set Not set Not set % of total headcount by indicated ethnic group5,6 Not set Not set
Not set 2013 2014 2015 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2013 2014 2015
Ethnic minority 16.1 13.7 14.7 2.7 2.5 2.7 2.4 1.5 11.2 11.4 11.5
White 83.9 86.3 85.3 1.9 2 1.8 2 1.1 88.8 88.6 88.5
Total 100 100 100 - - - - - 100 100 100
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Source: Resource Management Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Notes: Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
1. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
2. Data period 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
3. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees disciplined who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
4. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
5. Percentages shown are the number of employees by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
6. Data from previous years not available for this group. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Table 2.4: Percentage of employees by gender who were disciplined1,2 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Gender % disciplined by gender3,6 Not set Not set % of gender classification disciplined4 Not set Not set Not set Not set % of total headcount by gender5,6 Not set Not set
Not set 2013 2014 2015 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2013 2014 2015
Female 55.2 56.8 57.2 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.7 1 68.3 68.9 68.9
Male 44.8 43.2 42.8 3.1 3.1 2.8 2.9 1.6 31.7 31.1 31.1
Total 100 100 100 - - - - - 100 100 100
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Source: Resource Management Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Notes: Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
1. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
2. Data period 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
3. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees disciplined who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
4. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
5. Percentages shown are the number of employees by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
6. Data from previous years not available for this group. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set