Official Statistics

5. Gap between the employment rates for disabled people and the overall population: data table

Updated 11 July 2014
Download CSV 10.9 KB

5. Gap between the employment rates for disabled people and the overall population
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Data source Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Labour Force Survey Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Time period and availability Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Impact indicator covers disability. Splits currently available by age, ethnicity, gender and religion or belief. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Latest data available at July 2014 covered Quarter 1 2014. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Produced quarterly approximately six weeks after the period referred to. Three months data are combined Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
for the indicator. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
What does this tell us? Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
This indicator is measured by comparing the seasonally unadjusted employment rate for disabled people with the unadjusted working-age employment rate for Great Britain. This uses the ONS Headline Rate Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
definition of the employment rate which is for people aged between 16 and 64. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
These data allow the Department to monitor progress towards employment equality for disabled people. It allows the public to assess how well the Department is performing against its aim of promoting Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
high levels of employment by helping people move into work. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
The indicator is based on data from the Labour Force Survey, which does not record whether or not respondents are pregnant or have undergone gender reassignment, Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
so it is not possible to provide separate estimates for these groups. Respondents are asked their sexual orientation, but this data is only made available on a separate Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
version of the data, the Integrated Household Survey. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
How will an improvement be shown? Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Generally a decrease in the indicator will demonstrate that an improvement has been achieved. However, economic conditions will also need to be taken into account. For example, recent research indicates that employment Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
prospects for disabled people are less sensitive to economic conditions than the overall population.[1] This may mean that as the economy improves and overall rates increase, the gap between the disabled and the overall Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
employment rates will increase, which would represent a negative outcome for this indicator. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Links to other information that you may find useful Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
A full description of indicators towards disability equality by 2025 is available on the Independent Living and Office for Disability Issues website, available at: http://odi.dwp.gov.uk/roadmap-to-disability-equality/indicators.php Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
[1] An example of this research can be found online at: http://www.iza.org/conference_files/EcCrRiUnEm2010/berthoud_r281.pdf Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Table 5.1: Gap between employment rates for disabled people and the overall population by age, GB, Quarter 1 of each year (January - March) Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Age Gap (percentage points) Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set 2011 2012 2013 Gap in data 2014 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
16-17 10.8 6.3 6.4 Estimates from this point onwards should not be compared directly with earlier years, due to a change in definitions (see point 5 below) 8.5 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
18-24 20.6 16.3 17.9 Not set 20.7 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
25-34 24.4 26.4 27.2 Not set 30.1 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
35-44 26.4 27.0 24.5 Not set 29.6 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
45-54 24.6 26.7 27.5 Not set 30.6 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
55+ 19.8 20.9 22.1 Not set 25.7 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
There is a statistically significant difference in the employment rate gap between those aged under 25 and the over 25 age groups. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Source: LFS Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Notes: Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
1. Data is rounded to the nearest 0.1 percentage point Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
2. Data is subject to sampling variation and is not seasonally adjusted Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
3. Data covers GB only, not UK Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
4. Accuracy of data is limited by small sample sizes Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
5. Changes in Q2 2013 to the wording of the disability questions within the survey questionnaire, and a move to only reporting Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
those who are disabled within the core definition of the Equality Act, have led to a step change in the levels of reported Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
disability and their composition (e.g. proportion in employment). The move to only reporting those who are disabled Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
within the core definition of the Equality Act and the change in the wording of the questions, is to bring the Labour Force Survey Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
in line with the GSS harmonised definition for disability, which is being rolled out across all surveys. This has occurred as a result Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
of the Equality Act 2010. Therefore, estimates of disability from the Labour Force Survey for Q2 2013 onwards should not be compared Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
directly with earlier years. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Table 5.2: Gap between employment rates for disabled people and the overall population by ethnicity, GB, quarterly averages for each year Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Ethnicity Gap (percentage points) Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Q2 2010 - Q1 2011 Q2 2011 - Q1 2012 Q2 2012 - Q1 2013 Gap in data Q2 2013 - Q1 2014 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
White 24.8 25.1 25.5 Estimates from this point onwards should not be compared directly with earlier years, due to a change in definitions (see point 6 below) 28.7 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Mixed / Multiple ethnic groups 11.3 15.8 23.5 Not set 27.0 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Indian 23.1 24.5 20.9 Not set 23.4 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Pakistani / Bangladeshi 23.1 19.6 20.6 Not set 21.8 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Chinese / Other ethnic group 22.4 18.4 17.6 Not set 20.8 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Black / African / Caribbean / Black British 16.2 18.9 18.0 Not set 21.7 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
There is a statistically significant difference in the employment rate gap between the White and Mixed / Multiple ethnic groups and the remaining ethnic groups. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Ethnicity questions in the Labour Force Survey were changed in 2011, in line with the 2011 Census. The impact of these changes is under assessment by the Office for National Statistics. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Comparisons over time should be treated with caution. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Source: LFS Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Notes: Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
1. Data is rounded to the nearest 0.1 percentage point Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
2. Data is subject to sampling variation and is not seasonally adjusted Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
3. Data covers GB only, not UK Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
4. Accuracy of data is limited by small sample sizes Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
5. Ethnicity is self-reported Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
6. Changes in Q2 2013 to the wording of the disability questions within the survey questionnaire, and a move to only reporting Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
those who are disabled within the core definition of the Equality Act, have led to a step change in the levels of reported Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
disability and their composition (e.g. proportion in employment). The move to only reporting those who are disabled Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
within the core definition of the Equality Act and the change in the wording of the questions, is to bring the Labour Force Survey Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
in line with the GSS harmonised definition for disability, which is being rolled out across all surveys. This has occurred as a result Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
of the Equality Act 2010. Therefore, estimates of disability from the Labour Force Survey for Q2 2013 onwards should not be compared Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
directly with earlier years. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Table 5.3: Gap between employment rates for disabled people and the overall population by gender, GB, Quarter 1 of each year (January - March) Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Gender Gap (percentage points) Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set 2011 2012 2013 Gap in data 2014 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Male 25.8 26.4 26.8 Estimates from this point onwards should not be compared directly with earlier years, due to a change in definitions (see point 5 below) 31.3 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Female 20.5 21.3 21.7 Not set 24.2 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
There is a statistically significant difference in the employment rate gap between Males and Females. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Source: LFS Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Notes: Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
1. Data is rounded to the nearest 0.1 percentage point Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
2. Data is subject to sampling variation and is not seasonally adjusted Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
3. Data covers GB only, not UK Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
4. Accuracy of data is limited by small sample sizes Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
5. Changes in Q2 2013 to the wording of the disability questions within the survey questionnaire, and a move to only reporting Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
those who are disabled within the core definition of the Equality Act, have led to a step change in the levels of reported Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
disability and their composition (e.g. proportion in employment). The move to only reporting those who are disabled Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
within the core definition of the Equality Act and the change in the wording of the questions, is to bring the Labour Force Survey Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
in line with the GSS harmonised definition for disability, which is being rolled out across all surveys. This has occurred as a result Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
of the Equality Act 2010. Therefore, estimates of disability from the Labour Force Survey for Q2 2013 onwards should not be compared Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
directly with earlier years. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Table 5.4: Gap between employment rates for disabled people and the overall population by religion, GB, quarterly averages for each year Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Religion Gap (percentage points) Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Q2 2010 - Q1 2011 Q2 2011 - Q1 2012 Q2 2012 - Q1 2013 Gap in data Q2 2013 - Q1 2014 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
No religion 24.6 23.9 23.8 Estimates from this point onwards should not be compared directly with earlier years, due to a change in definitions (see point 7 below) 26.7 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Christian 23.8 25.0 25.5 Not set 29.2 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Buddhist 22.6 22.2 19.9 Not set 20.1 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Hindu 19.3 21.0 17.3 Not set 22.5 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Jewish 20.3 9.4 12.3 Not set 22.5 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Muslim 22.6 19.9 21.1 Not set 19.9 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Sikh 19.9 22.3 24.2 Not set 28.3 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Any other religion 25.1 24.1 25.9 Not set 23.1 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
There is a statistically significant difference in the employment rate gap between those whose religion is Jewish, when compared to all of the other religions. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Religion questions in the Labour Force Survey were changed in 2011, in line with the 2011 Census. Comparisons over time should be treated with caution. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Notes: Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
1. Data is rounded to the nearest 0.1 percentage point Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
2. Data is subject to sampling variation and is not seasonally adjusted Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
3. Data covers GB only, not UK Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
4. Accuracy of data is limited by small sample sizes Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
5. Religion or Belief is self-reported Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
6. * denotes sample size is too small to reliably quote Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
7. Changes in Q2 2013 to the wording of the disability questions within the survey questionnaire, and a move to only reporting Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
those who are disabled within the core definition of the Equality Act, have led to a step change in the levels of reported Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
disability and their composition (e.g. proportion in employment). The move to only reporting those who are disabled Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
within the core definition of the Equality Act and the change in the wording of the questions, is to bring the Labour Force Survey Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
in line with the GSS harmonised definition for disability, which is being rolled out across all surveys. This has occurred as a result Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
of the Equality Act 2010. Therefore, estimates of disability from the Labour Force Survey for Q2 2013 onwards should not be compared Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
directly with earlier years. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set