Corporate report
(CSV) Grievances – DWP equality information 2013 (data)
Updated 12 July 2013
Download CSV 3.73 KB
| 18. Grievances | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not set | |||||
| Data source | |||||
| Not set | |||||
| Resource Management. | |||||
| Not set | |||||
| Time period and availability | |||||
| Not set | |||||
| Latest data covers the period from 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2013. | |||||
| Not set | |||||
| What does this tell us? | |||||
| Not set | |||||
| The data presented here show the percentage of employees who have raised a grievance against their status in relation to each of the following protected characteristics: age; disability; ethnicity; and gender. | |||||
| Not set | |||||
| As the total number of grievances are quite small, the percentages can vary considerably without implying significant differences. However, the percentage of employees by gender who raise a grievance is close to the corresponding headcount indicating similar behaviour. | |||||
| Not set | |||||
| Comparison with the 2012 report shows that the overall percentage of people raising a grievance has declined and this has been reflected across all age groups. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||||
| How will an improvement be shown? | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||||
| Generally the similarity of this indicator in a protected and non-protected group will indicate equivalent behaviour. However, this will require a reasonably complete declaration rate and sufficiently large volumes to be precise. In addition, it should also be borne in mind that raising a grievance is an individual’s decision impacted by a range of personal factors. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||||
| Table 18.1: Percentage of employees by age who raised a grievance1,2 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||||
| Age | % of grievances by age group3, 6 | % of age group that raised a grievance4 | Not set | Not set | % of total headcount by age group5, 6 |
| Not set | 2013 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 |
| 16-24 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 1.7 |
| 25-29 | 6 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 5.4 |
| 30-34 | 10.5 | 1 | 1.3 | 1 | 8.6 |
| 35-39 | 10.4 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 9.9 |
| 40-44 | 14.4 | 1 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 14.2 |
| 45-49 | 18.9 | 0.9 | 1 | 0.8 | 19.5 |
| 50-54 | 16.5 | 0.7 | 1 | 0.7 | 19 |
| 55-59 | 13.6 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 13.8 |
| 60-64 | 6.9 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 6.3 |
| 65+ | 1.3 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 1.5 |
| Total | 100 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 100 |
| Not set | |||||
| Table 18.2: Percentage of employees by indicated disability who raised a grievance 1,2 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||||
| Disability | % of grievances by indicated disability group3, 6 | % of indicated disability group that raised a grievance4 | Not set | Not set | % of total headcount by indicated disability group5, 6 |
| Not set | 2013 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 |
| Disabled | 12.3 | 1.5 | 2 | 1.6 | 6.5 |
| Non-disabled | 87.7 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 93.5 |
| Total | 100 | - | - | - | 100 |
| Not set | |||||
| Table 18.3: Percentage of employees by indicated ethnicity who raised a grievance 1,2 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||||
| Ethnicity | % of grievances by indicated ethnic group3, 6 | % of indicated ethnic group that raised a grievance4 | Not set | Not set | % of total headcount by indicated ethnic group5, 6 |
| Not set | 2013 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 |
| Ethnic minority | 16.4 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 11.2 |
| White | 83.6 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 88.8 |
| Total | 100 | - | - | - | 100 |
| Not set | |||||
| Table 18.4: Percentage of employees by gender who raised a grievance1,2 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||||
| Gender | % of grievances by gender3, 6 | % of gender classification that raised a grievance4 | Not set | Not set | % of total headcount by gender5, 6 |
| Not set | 2013 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 |
| Female | 69 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 68.3 |
| Male | 31 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 31.7 |
| Total | 100 | - | - | - | 100 |
| Not set | |||||
| Source: Resource Management | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||||
| Notes: | |||||
| 1. Data period 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2013. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given. | |||||
| 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. | |||||
| 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees working part time by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees working part time who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. | |||||
| 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees working part time by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. | |||||
| 5. Percentages shown are the number of employees by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. | |||||
| 6. Data from previous years not available for this group. |