The review will consider and make recommendations on improving legislation and practice around the Mental Health Act.
Purpose of the review
The review was set up to look at how the legislation in the Mental Health Act 1983 is used and how practice can improve. The purpose of the review is to understand the reasons for:
- rising rates of detention under the Act
- the disproportionate number of people from black and minority ethnic groups detained under the Act
- processes that are out of step with a modern mental health care system
The review will seek the views of service users, carers, relevant professionals, and affected organisations in producing recommendations. It will produce a report with recommendations for change in autumn 2018.
- Professor Sir Simon Wessely – Regius Professor of Psychiatry at King’s College London and president of the Royal Society of Medicine
- Steven Gilbert – service user and serious mental health living consultant
- Sir Mark Hedley – retired high court judge
- Rabbi Baroness Julia Neuberger – former CEO of the King’s Fund and Chair of the Liverpool Care Pathway Review
The advisory panel will bring together stakeholders with an interest in the Mental Health Act and its application. For more information about the advisory panel see the document below.
The working group will deliver the direction set by the review’s leadership and advisory panel, supporting the development of recommendations. For more information about the working group see the document below.
The service user and carer group reflects the views and experiences of people who have been detained (‘sectioned’) under the Act, or cared for people who have been. For more information about the service user and carer group see the document below.
The African and Caribbean group will make recommendations designed to ensure that people of African and Caribbean descent with mental health challenges:
- receive the treatment and support they need, when and where they need it
- are treated with dignity, and that their liberty and autonomy are respected as far as possible
For more information about the African and Caribbean group see the document below.
The evidence and analysis group will provide expert analytical advice to the chair and advisory panel. For more information about the evidence and analysis group see the document below.
This is a summary of the review’s work so far. Easy Read and British Sign Language versions are also available
The review continues to work closely with stakeholders and would like to hear from people who want to get involved. The review is especially keen to hear from service users and carers.
We will carry out more focus groups to address where there are gaps in evidence.
If you have evidence or experiences relevant to issues and topics set out in the interim report, please email MHActReview@dh.gsi.gov.uk.