TQ Mark Grade Changes Outside of ROMMA: guide to the data submission process
Published 2 December 2021
Applies to England
© Crown copyright 2021
This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gov.uk.
Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned.
This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/tq-mark-grade-changes-outside-of-romma/mark-or-grade-changes-outside-of-reviews-of-marking-and-moderation-romm-and-appeals-guide-to-the-data-submission-process
Introduction
In order to fulfil our regulatory and accreditation functions as set out in the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009, we require awarding organisations to provide exams delivery data for regulated qualifications.
What data will be collected?
Mark and grade changes outside of reviews of marking and moderation and appeals data will be collected for all Technical Qualifications (TQs) within T levels for learners in England.
When will data be collected?
Data will be collected according to the reporting schedule which is agreed and maintained by Ofqual’s data services team.
Updates to formats and guidance
This guidance document will be updated regularly. Any changes to procedure will be incorporated into the guidance document.
How to submit your data
Your data should be submitted to us in CSV format. Please refer to the ‘Connecting to Ofqual’s data portal and uploading data’ document on our web page to help you submit your files to us. If you need to ask us about a data submission please do contact the Data Services team by emailing data.services@ofqual.gov.uk, please do not send your data files via email to Data Services or to any other Ofqual email address, or via Contact the Regulator in the Portal.
Amendments to data
Ofqual staff will not alter data once it has been submitted. If you find an error or omission after you’ve had a successful upload, please notify us by emailing data.services@ofqual.gov.uk. We need to reject the existing submission before you can upload a new file.
How your data will be used
This data will be used to undertake our regulatory activities and, where required, to produce Official Statistics to fulfil our responsibility as a government department.
General completion guidelines
-
Data should include mark or grade changes for all assessments taken within the reporting period
-
All mark changes should be provided, regardless of whether or not is has resulted in a grade change
-
If a mark or grade has more than one change for different reasons, this should be recorded as an additional row of data. Please report the cumulative change in the mark/grade fields for each row in these instances, rather than the individual changes
-
Changes relating to special consideration should only be for requests made on or after results dates
-
When a change is made to a candidate’s mark and/or grade which is later reversed, we would like to capture both changes. For the row indicating the change back to the original mark or grade we would expect the reason for change to be documented “reversal of a previous grade change”. If possible, we advise that AOs only report on the change and reversal of change if the initial change was issued to a centre
File format
The file must be CSV format and the first row must be headers as displayed in the Name column of the table below. The subsequent rows must have the values of the data to be reported which must match the format and validation rules below.
| Name | Description | Position | Validation Regular Expression | Description of Regular Expression / Accepted values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ReportingDate | Date the file was due to be submitted to Ofqual regardless of when it was actually uploaded (this date will be made available by Ofqual) | 1 |
^(0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])[/](0[1-9]|1[012])[/](20)\d\d $ or ^(20)\d\d[-](0[1-9]|1[012])[-](0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])$
|
The date in the following format: day (2 digits), forward slash, month (2 digits), forward slash, year (4 digits), or: year (4 digits), a dash, month (2 digits), a dash, day (2 digits) |
| AssessmentSeries | Assessment series data relates to, for example June 2023 | 2 | ^(June)([][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9])$ |
Full month name and year of Assessment series for example June 2023 |
| AwardingOrganisation | Acronym of the awarding organisation | 3 | ^.{1,100}$ |
A valid AO Acronym. 1 to 100 characters accepted Note: value must be consistent within the file |
| QualificationNumber | Unique identifier for the TQ as it appears in Ofqual’s Register of Regulated qualifications | 4 | ^.{1,10}$ |
Valid Qualification Number. 1 to 10 characters accepted |
| ComponentCode | Unique identifier for the component which the assessment relates to (assigned by the awarding organisation) | 5 | ^.{1,10}$ |
1 to 10 characters |
| SubComponentType | TQ sub-component which the assessment falls under (Core Exam, Core Project, Occupational Specialism) | 6 | ^(Core Exam|Core Project|Occupational Specialism)$ |
Accepted values: Core Exam, Core Project, Occupational Specialism Note: enter -2 if not applicable |
| AssessmentCode | Unique identifier for the assessment (assigned by the awarding organisation) | 7 | ^.{1,10}$ |
1 to 10 characters |
| ULN | Unique Learner Number | 8 | ^.{0000000001,99999 99999}$ |
A numeric value between 0000000001 and 9999999999 |
| UCI | Unique Candidate Identifier | 9 | ^.{1,13}$ |
Alpha-numeric 13 characters Note: enter -2 if not available |
| UKPRN | UK Provider Reference Number | 10 | ^.{10000000,99999999}$ |
A numeric value between 10000000 and 99999999 |
| NCN | Centre ID – National Centre Number | 11 | ^\d{1,5}$ |
Up to 5-digit integer accepted Note: enter -2 if not available |
| OriginalAssessmentRawMark | Original Assessment Raw Mark | 12 | ^\d{1,3}$ |
Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable |
| ResultingAssessmentRawMark | Resulting Assessment Raw Mark | 13 | ^\d{1,3}$ |
Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable |
| OriginalAssessmentUMSMark | Original Assessment UMS Mark | 14 | ^\d{1,3}$ |
Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable |
| ResultingAssessmentUMSMark | Resulting Assessment UMS Mark | 15 | ^\d{1,3}$ |
Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable |
| OriginalSubComponentRawMark | Original Sub-component Raw Mark | 16 | ^\d{1,3}$ |
Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable |
| ResultingSubComponentRawMark | Resulting Sub-component Raw Mark | 17 | ^\d{1,3}$ |
Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable |
| OriginalSubComponentUMSMark | Original Sub-component UMS Mark | 18 | ^\d{1,3}$ |
Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable |
| ResultingSubComponentUMSMark | Resulting Sub-component UMS Mark | 19 | ^\d{1,3}$ |
Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable |
| OriginalComponentRawMark | Original component Raw Mark | 20 | ^\d{1,3}$ |
Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable |
| ResultingComponentRawMark | Resulting component Raw Mark | 21 | ^\d{1,3}$ |
Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable |
| OriginalComponentUMSMark | Original component UMS Mark | 22 | ^\d{1,3}$ |
Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable |
| ResultingComponentUMSMark | Resulting component UMS Mark | 23 | ^\d{1,3}$ |
Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable |
| OriginalAssessmentGrade | Original Assessment Grade | 24 | ^(A*|A|B|C|D|E|Q|U|X|Distinction|Merit|Pass|-2)$ |
Accepted values: A* A B C D E U Distinction Merit Pass Note: enter -2 if not applicable |
| ResultingAssessmentGrade | Resulting Assessment Grade | 25 | ^(A*|A|B|C|D|E|Q|U|X|Distinction|Merit|Pass|-2)$ |
Accepted values: A* A B C D E U Distinction Merit Pass Note: enter -2 if not applicable |
| OriginalSubComponentGrade | Original Sub-Component Grade | 26 | ^(A*|A|B|C|D|E|Q|U|X|Distinction|Merit|Pass|-2)$ |
Accepted values: A* A B C D E U Distinction Merit Pass Note: enter -2 if not applicable |
| ResultingSubComponentGrade | Resulting Sub-Component Grade | 27 | ^(A*|A|B|C|D|E|Q|U|X|Distinction|Merit|Pass|-2)$ |
Accepted values: A* A B C D E U Distinction Merit Pass Note: enter -2 if not applicable |
| OriginalComponentGrade | Original Component Grade | 28 | ^(A*|A|B|C|D|E|Q|U|X|Distinction|Merit|Pass|-2)$ |
Accepted values: A* A B C D E U Distinction Merit Pass Note: enter -2 if not applicable |
| ResultingComponentGrade | Resulting Component Grade | 29 | ^(A*|A|B|C|D|E|Q|U|X|Distinction|Merit|Pass|-2)$ |
Accepted values: A* A B C D E U Distinction Merit Pass Note: enter -2 if not applicable |
| ReasonForReconsideration | The reason for reconsideration of marks/grades | 30 | ^(Wider investigation into marking as a result of a review of marking|Wider investigation into marking as a result of a review of moderation|Wider investigation as a result of an appeal|Wider investigation not as a result of a review of marking or moderation or appeal|Complaint|Special consideration|Malpractice|Other)$ |
Accepted values: Wider investigation into marking as a result of a review of marking, Wider investigation into marking as a result of a review of moderation, Wider investigation as a result of an appeal, Wider investigation not as a result of a review of marking or moderation or appeal, Complaint, Special consideration, Malpractice, Other |
| ReasonForMarkOrGradeChange | ^(Work not seen or marked by original examiner|Error in totalling of marks by original examiner (e.g. examiner did not add up marks correctly)|Error in transferring marks from paper script to exam processing system (e.g. discrepancy between marks on script and marks on exam board system)|Error in inputting marks on online marking system by original examiner (e.g. mark incorrectly input)|Error in centre submitting marks (e.g. incorrect mark submitted for non-examination assessment)|Original marking/processing had incorrectly dealt with a candidate rubric error and/or answer in wrong answer space.|Original marker unable to read candidate response (e.g. illegible handwriting)|Application of special consideration during post-results |Missing script located (e.g. original script not marked)|Processing error (e.g. scanning or scaling or grading)|Auto-marking error (e.g. wrong answer key)|Outcome of malpractice investigation (e.g. mark change due to estimation of marks)|Marking – misapplication of levels based mark scheme|Marking – misapplication of points-based mark scheme|Marking – unusual candidate response (e.g. candidate response not covered by the mark scheme)|Moderation – misapplication of criteria by original moderator (e.g. error by original moderator)|Special cases (e.g. candidate sat wrong paper)|Reversal of a previous change)$ |
31 | Accepted values as per pre-agreed list | Accepted values: Work not seen or marked by original examiner, Error in totalling of marks by original examiner (e.g. examiner did not add up marks correctly), Error in transferring marks from paper script to exam processing system (e.g. discrepancy between marks on script and marks on exam board system), Error in inputting marks on online marking system by original examiner (e.g. mark incorrectly input), Error in centre submitting marks (e.g. incorrect mark submitted for non-examination assessment), Original marking/processing had incorrectly dealt with a candidate rubric error and/or answer in wrong answer space., Original marker unable to read candidate response (e.g. illegible handwriting), Application of special consideration during post- results, Missing script located (e.g. original script not marked), Processing error (e.g. scanning or scaling or grading), Auto-marking error (e.g. wrong answer key), Outcome of malpractice investigation (e.g. mark change due to estimation of marks), Marking – misapplication of levels based mark scheme, Marking – misapplication of points-based mark scheme, Marking – unusual candidate response (e.g. candidate response not covered by the mark scheme), Moderation – misapplication of criteria by original moderator (e.g. error by original moderator), Special cases (e.g. candidate sat wrong paper), Reversal of a previous change |
| DateOfChange | Date when the mark or grade change was made | 32 |
^(0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])[/](0[1-9]|1[012])[/](20)\d\d $ or ^(20)\d\d[-](0[1-9]|1[012])[-](0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])$
|
The date in the following format: day (2 digits), forward slash, month (2 digits), forward slash, year (4 digits), or: year (4 digits), a dash, month (2 digits), a dash, day (2 digits) |
Annex A: accepted values for Reason For Reconsideration
• Wider investigation into marking as a result of a review of marking
• Wider investigation into marking as a result of a review of moderation
• Wider investigation as a result of an appeal
• Wider investigation not as a result of a review of marking or moderation or appeal
• Complaint
• Special consideration
• Malpractice
• Other
Annex B: accepted values for Reason For Mark Or Grade Change
• Work not seen or marked by original examiner
• Error in totalling of marks by original examiner (e.g. examiner did not add up marks correctly)
• Error in transferring marks from paper script to exam processing system (e.g. discrepancy between marks on script and marks on exam board system)
• Error in inputting marks on online marking system by original examiner (e.g. mark incorrectly input)
• Error in centre submitting marks (e.g. incorrect mark submitted for non-examination assessment)
• Original marking/processing had incorrectly dealt with a candidate rubric error and/or answer in wrong answer space.
• Original marker unable to read candidate response (e.g. illegible handwriting)
• Application of special consideration during post-results
• Missing script located (e.g. original script not marked)
• Processing error (e.g. scanning or scaling or grading)
• Auto-marking error (e.g. wrong answer key)
• Outcome of malpractice investigation (e.g. mark change due to estimation of marks)
• Marking – misapplication of levels based mark scheme
• Marking – misapplication of points-based mark scheme
• Marking – unusual candidate response (e.g. candidate response not covered by the mark scheme)
• Moderation – misapplication of criteria by original moderator (e.g. error by original moderator)
• Special cases (e.g. candidate sat wrong paper)
• Reversal of a previous change
Contacts
For all queries relating to the data collection process, amendments to data previously provided, or for general guidance. please contact:
Data services
Ofqual
2nd floor, 1 Friargate
Station Square
Coventry
CV1 2GN