CRP v Secretary of State for Defence (AFCS): [2022] UKUT 232 (AAC)

Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Najib on 12 August 2022.

From:
HM Courts & Tribunals Service and Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
Published
3 October 2022
Last updated
4 June 2024 — See all updates
Categories:
War pensions and armed forces compensation
Sub-categories:
War pensions and armed forces compensation - Armed Forces Compensation Scheme
Judges:
Najib, S
Decision date:
12 August 2022

Read the full decision in UA-2021-001017-WP.

Judicial Summary

Armed Forces and Reserve Forces (Compensation Scheme) Order 2011 Schedule 3 Table 3 Item 2 – whether footnotes (a) and (b) are mutually exclusive – the correct approach to footnote (b): meaning of “able to work regularly” and date at which the conditions in the relevant descriptor must be met in order for that descriptor to apply.

Published 3 October 2022
Last updated 4 June 2024 + show all updates

  1. The upper tribunal decision reversed by the Court of Appeal in Christopher Pearson v The Secretary of State for Defence [2024] EWCA Civ 150.

  2. First published.